Jump to content

Talk:En ventre sa mere

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 09:52, 30 January 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I have amended the article to cite the earliest authority to be found for the phrase "en ventre sa mere" in legal language. The concept did not originate in the 1972 Australian case as it was used at least as far back as the nineteenth century but (given its French name) probably far earlier. The Australian case is relevant to the extension of the use of this concept from testate/intestate succession to compensation claims. Francobriton 21:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about frozen sperm or embryos which are used for a birth years later? 68.58.152.238 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC). sperm aren't viable life, embryos in a freezer aren't "en ventre" leur mere82.112.142.181 (talk) 23:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]