Talk:Cluster fly

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Personal attacks removed

There seems to be little need or purpose served by allowing the numerous personal attacks posted here by User:AzLehrer and his sockpuppet accounts ("Pandur" and "Condor"; see Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/AzLehrer) to remain. The edits by this editor violate WP:SOCK, WP:NPOV, WP:CIVIL, WP:OWN, WP:SPS, and others, and really don't need to be given continued exposure here. Readers interested in seeing these insults can do so by viewing the page history prior to today's date. Dyanega (talk) 23:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cluster fly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080411095829/http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/Diptera/people/FCT_pdf/FGNAMES.pdf to http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/diptera/people/FCT_pdf/FGNAMES.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The organism for this wikipedia fly is the Cluster fly or Pollenia. The strengths of this page are that it includes a helpful image and it also includes an interesting short video of the Cluster fly. At least 3 general categories in this article are missing and I base these recommendations on the article for Calliphoridae (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calliphoridae). They are: development, food sources, and predators. Each of these categories create a fuller picture about what distinguishes the cluster flies from others physically, scavenging, and predation. More detail on predation can give context about Cluster fley behavior. This Wikipedia page appears to be incomplete, however. It has very little detail about the cluster fly. There are too few references (only two total) and none of them are included inside of the text. The claim that cluster flies “do not present a health hazard because they do not lay eggs in human food” should be substantiated by verified evidence and cited in-text. Also, describing cluster flies as a “nuisance” is biased because it is a subjective description of how a fly seems to a human rather than an objective description of what the fly is itself. Further, the grammar itself is sometimes nonsensical. For example, the page states that the cluster fly is “parasitic on earthworms,” whent the correct wording would be that it is “parasitic to earthworms.” A short revision would be sufficient to improve the grammar in this article. Chickfilkay (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have changed it to "parasitise earthworms" which seems to me to be most correct.

I would add that I wasn't taught to be concerned about the health risk from flies due to their laying eggs in human food (though obviously that would be a problem) but because they have indiscrimate feeding habits. That is, they will walk around in a toilet feeding on faeces and then land on food, spreading "germs" on their feet and in their saliva. Saying a fly isn't a health risk in the former way doesn't have any implications as to the health risk or otherwise from the latter. Perhaps this page is in need of attention from someone who has a reasonable knowledge of the literature and can comment on the sense or otherwise of this, and reference it properly?

Otherwise, I think the "not hazardous to human health" statement might reasonably be removed.

Finally, the list could do with geographical organisation or something: I was looking for the British cluster fly/flies, and that is a long list to sort through...

:-)

FloweringOctopus (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]