This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 14:28, 31 January 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "FL" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Nepal}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 14:28, 31 January 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "FL" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Nepal}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Would appreciate if next time, you put up the sources for the hook here in the nomination itself rather than making the reviewer hunt for them in the article. Also there is no need for wikilinking crime boss, police officer and bank robber in the hook. These are common words understood by most readers. Also I think there is a lot of adjective before Maoist and Madan Bhandari can be written as popular communist leader. My suggestion ALT0a: ... that the film roles of Nepali actor Dayahang Rai(pictured) include a crime boss, a Maoist, the suspected killer of a popular communist leader, a police officer, and a bank robber?Roller26 (talk) 14:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think the hook change made by me is only nominal and the essentially rewording the original hook by the nominator and hence approving it. Good to go. Roller26 (talk) 04:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.