This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Hello, and a good start to the page. Here are my recommendations:
Separate the opinion itself from the "Background" section. In para. 2 of the background, the article starts discussing the opinion. This paragraph should mention the three incentives, and which ones were challenged - if the rationale for the challenges is different from the rationale of the opinion and dissent, I would note that here (but it's probably not the case).
Create an "Opinion of the Court" section. Put the stuff taken out of Background here - tell us what the decision was and what the rationale was. Make the Take Title Provision section a sub-section (three ='s) of this new section. The last paragraph of this section probably stands on its own, however.
Pinpoint cite the direct quotes from the case.
I'm not positive on this, but I think that the See Also section shouldn't be links to lists/categories - it's more of relevant things to the subject of the article, e.g. in this case the WP article on the act - which doesn't exist. I don't think that presence in the same volume of the U.S. reports really is relevant.Manumitany (talk) 00:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
