Talk:IBM A2

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

PowerPC vs. Power ISA

As the A2 implements the Power ISA, as mentioned in the article, it is backward compatible with PowerPC code but it is not a PowerPC processor. Unless somebody finds an IBM document to the contrary, I propose to move this article to IBM A2. --EnOreg (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This document regarding development for the BlueGene/Q (consisting of numerous A2 cores) refers the th eprocessor as "PowerPC". http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247948.pdf

For example, from the Blue Gene/Qhardware overview:

"Compute cards contain 16 IBM Blue Gene/Q PowerPC® A2 core processors and 16 GB of memory."

For example, from the intro to Chapter 7:

"This chapter describes the considerations for developing, compiling, and optimizing C/C++ and Fortran applications for the IBM Blue Gene/Q PowerPC A2 processor and the quad-processing extension (QPX) in the PowerPC AS v2 floating-point unit."

-- Henriok (talk) 14:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much, Henriok, for this competent reply. IBM's terminology here is very confusing. But you've convinced me: It is a PowerPC.

That wouldn't be the first time :) Some use PowerPC, POWER and Power interchangeably, but incorrect. It's a nuisance. The writers probably use the term that's most familiar to them, and not really seeing the larger picture, and frankly.. technologically, it's no biggie. It's all pretty much the same.-- Henriok (talk) 08:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As the A2 user's manual hardly mentions the term and the IBM documents I found mostly refer to it simply as A2, I still think IBM A2 would be a better lemma. PowerPC does not appear to be part of the "official" product name. Thoughts? --EnOreg (talk) 17:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can support that. Technically it's a "Power ISA" processor, so your document is very correct, but I can easily find contemporary documentation for BlueGeneQs and PowerEN processors that only use "PowerPC".. I guess it was a PPC during development, and then marketing changed the term. -- Henriok (talk) 08:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I've made the change. --EnOreg (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on IBM A2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Open source section

says that both A2O and A2I are written in VHDL. A2O is in verilog. https://github.com/openpower-cores/a2o/tree/master/rel/src/verilog/work also perhaps worth mentioning somewhere about the A2I using VHDL to design at near gate-level rather than as a High-level design, to guarantee high performance. example: https://github.com/openpower-cores/a2i/blob/master/rel/src/vhdl/work/fuq_alg_sh16.vhdl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lkcl (talk • contribs) 19:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amended regarding A2O and Verilog -- Henriok (talk) 11:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]