Talk:ISGEC

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Tidying and referencing

I have made some edits which have not removed any information, but have tidied some of the references and tightened some of the text. However the article still relies heavily on the company's own website which is a weakness. If there are any reliable sources we can add that would be great. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 10:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have now added internal wikilinks as far as I can - made a mistake with U.P. initially putting it down as United Provinces but of course it's Uttar Pradesh! There may be other things we can wikilink to - I was hoping to find an article on John Thompson, the UK firm they linked with, but unless it's this company which closed in 2004, I can't find them. They were in the right line of business (pressure vessels) so maybe it is after all... Will carry on trying to add improvements as I can find them. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 14:33, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These references are not formatted quite right - have a look at how I've formatted references elsewhere in the article, or just leave them if you prefer and when you're finished adding them I'll try and tidy them up. If I do it, I'll leave an example here of how to format them in future, so you get the hang of it. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 13:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]