Talk:Moonlet

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Justification?

Can we see references showing that objects like Dactyl are commonly called "moonlets" by scientists? The page for Dactyl calls it a "moon", and in fact there is already a page on asteroid moons. A Google Scholar search on "dactyl moonlet" resulted in 20 hits, while a search on "dactyl moon" resulted in 1,220 hits.

The objects in Saturn's A Ring are in fact called "moonlets" in the scientific literature, but I don't think enough is known about them to support a page by itself. The current mention in Rings of Saturn is sufficient. I would be inclined to delete this page. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 02:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about the asteroids, but when I found this page thought Saturn's should be added. There isn't much point to it, except for the link from Moons of Saturn, where all the other moons have links. — kwami (talk) 06:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moonlet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121223053424/http://www.stfc.ac.uk/PMC/PRel/STFC/CassColl.aspx to http://www.stfc.ac.uk/PMC/PRel/STFC/CassColl.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Size Matters

What would be the maximum size below which an object would be called a moonlet, but above which it would be called a moon?

Would there also be a minimum size below which “micromoonlets” would just become impossibly numerous to count?

CielProfond (talk) 02:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]