Talk:Stuart Nash

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New Zealand: Politics Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

2008 Napier seat

I removed clearly unsubstantiated and incorrect facts. The Napier seat was held by Russell Fairbrother from 2002 - 2005. He lost that election to Chris Tremain who was re-elected in 2008. While Stuart Nash contested the 2008 election, Chris Tremain was re-elected. The stated facts clearly conflicts with the Napier (New Zealand electorate) page

Sendervictorius (talk) 09:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you have misread the page. The page says that "Nash contested the 2008 selection". this is an internal Labour party contest. He lost this and therefore Fairbrother went on to contest Tremain at the election NOT Nash. The fact is also referenced. Mattlore (talk) 09:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite right. Perhaps wording could be be improved to emphasise that this was the labour party candidacy selection. Sendervictorius (talk) 09:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a go, but it is pretty hard without going into a tangent. Hopefully it's an improvement. Mattlore (talk) 09:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]