This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 18:46, 8 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Food and drink}}, {{WikiProject Brands}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 18:46, 8 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Food and drink}}, {{WikiProject Brands}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
The lead is a little hard to understand. Try simplifying the language. Keep researching the subject and this article can only get better.--Jtbunting1 (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1. This article is clearly written although extremely short and lacking detail.
2. For the amount of information given the article seems factually accurate.
3. Article covers the topic narrowly at best.
4. This article is written from a neutral point of view
5. This article is stable.
6. There are no image policy wrongdoings in this article.
7. Article is free of obvious copyright violations
JedGooden (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]