Talk:Arighi Bianchi
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arighi Bianchi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Assessment Report
[edit]- The article needs to be massively expanded.
- It should make use of sections.
- Photos need to be added.
- References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 15:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arighi Bianchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100812140923/http://www.cube.org.uk/thecity/archisnap_detail.asp?id=74 to http://www.cube.org.uk/thecity/archisnap_detail.asp?id=74
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)