Talk:Space mathematics

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Physics

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles

I was really disappointed to reach this point and find nothing about the role of mathemeatics in space navigation. I had just been reading up on tensors and thought that would be applicable. I was prepared for there to be no mention of tensors, but to find nothing at all....

Wikibooks?

Since this article is educational in its intent, I think it'd go better in Wikibooks, no? --朝彦 (Asahiko) 15:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frames of reference

This article needs to introduce the notion of a "frame of reference" much earlier. Otherwise the sentence, "Of course, the gravity fields of Earth and Moon also affect its motion, but for short distances, the motion appears perfectly straight" is completely erroneous. (The motion is straight only in a rotating frame of reference. In an inertial frame, a spacecraft slowly approaching the Moon is moving in a circular orbit very similar to the orbit of the Moon.) Understandably the article wants to avoid complex mathematics, but it still needs to be correct! Sdsds 17:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original research?

Is there even a recognised field of study named space mathematics? Without a source to that effect I think this page should be deleted. Martijn Meijering (talk) 21:52, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]