Jump to content

Talk:Ten Minutes by Tractor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 01:08, 10 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Australia}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Source Table

[edit]

Source assessment table: prepared by User:Jack4576
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/lifestyle/food/ten-minutes-by-tractor-restaurant-review-2023-kara-monssen-visits-mornington-peninsula-gem/news-story/6114dfbce7dc48181cc2e167c156c943 Yes Herald Sun's restaurant reviews are known to be independent and professional Yes The source is a major Australian news publication Yes The article is a focussed discussion of the subject; in detail, and in-depth. This discussion occurs throughout a lengthy review per an established restaurant review tradition as articulated in WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS. The relevant prose does not interview the subject.

The source is not a 'local' source. While the meaning of the word 'local' in WP:AUD is contested by some, the incumbent practice on Wikipedia is that major news publications are not excluded as 'local sources' when reporting on subjects within their jurisdictional focus which obviously is quite wide. Here, the restaurant is located within this news publication's primary area of reporting focus; which is State of Victoria

Yes
https://www.smh.com.au/traveller/inspiration/ten-minutes-by-tractor-mornington-peninsula-the-lunch-that-keeps-on-giving-20220905-h265kt.html Yes Sydney Morning Herald's restaurant reviews are known to be independent and professional Yes The source is a major Australian news publication Yes The article is a focussed discussion of the subject; in detail, and in-depth. This discussion occurs throughout a lengthy review per an established restaurant review tradition as articulated in WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS. The relevant prose does not interview the subject.

The source is not a 'local' source. While the meaning of the word 'local' in WP:AUD is contested by some, the incumbent practice on Wikipedia is that major news publications are not excluded as 'local sources' when reporting on subjects within their jurisdictional focus which obviously is quite wide. Here, the restaurant is located within this news publication's primary area of reporting focus; which is Australia

Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Jack4576 (talk) 09:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

Jack4576 (talk) 01:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]