Talk:Publicly funded elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I just added the california clean money campaign link (my first edit on widipedia) - Jeff Marks

Deb Simpson

Should this page mention state senator of Maine Deb Simpson? She was a waitress before getting elected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.226.192.133 (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

support/criticism

I think this article needs a support and criticism section. The only criticism I have heard about clean elections has to do with it restricting freedom of speech, too much government involvement, and increase of taxes to pay for it. I do not know if all these points are valid but it's what I gathered from the PBS's NOW transcript http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/242.html. 69.88.112.114 00:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John McCain

I don't believe that John McCain is a supporter of (fully) clean elections. I am removing his name as there is no citation. Nealc9999 18:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title of Page

I believe that the more a more formal title for this page should be publicly financed elections. I will not change as I am not sure exactly of the consequences of doing so, as well as the whether that is the general understanding of others. Nealc9999 18:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why capitalized?

"Clean elections" is not a proper noun, yet this page is called "Clean Elections". I moved it to "Clean elections", and a few months later someone moved it back. Why?

If I see no response here in a while, I'll move it again. Cos (talk) 00:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion beyond the US

This article could do with being expanded to cover the topic in the context of countries other than the United States. Hasbn (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Serious Neutrality Issue

I haven't found a single source that is not in favor of or neutral to "clean elections" calling them as such, except in reference to a group that is supporting it. "Publicly financed campaigns" or "Fund Matching (campaign finance)" as titles would be much closer to what the article is actually describing. When the title is favorable to the subject, there's a problem. I'm a new editor, so I'm going to read more on NPOV tags before placing one on this, but right now I think it might require one. At the very least, the lead section needs to be rewritten. Nmproofer (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Publicly funded elections. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]