Talk:Darcs

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Rename

DARCS is the name of the software. What it stands for is pretty much immaterial. I think it should be moved to DARCS, or DARCS (software) if there's a clash. What do other people think?— ciphergoth 13:18, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)

I would prefer Darcs to DARCS. The web site and documentation seem to use "darcs" and capitalize in titles and in the beginning of sentences like it was a general noun. It's a name, and it's not pronounced letter by letter.

Per above, I agree that the article should be called "Darcs", not "DARCS". Any objections? Neilc 07:20, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I support the rename to "Darcs". I would have done it already, but there's discussion and history there on that name at the moment. --TuukkaH 08:48, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the move and merged the two pages' histories. —Cleared a s filed. 14:21, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

logo and capatilization

needs to add a darcs logo please. And, please make sure the capitilization is correct. thx.

Fair use rationale for Image:Darcs-logo.png

Image:Darcs-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict bug

I think http://bugs.darcs.net/issue378 is the bug being referred to in the Bugs section. If so, this link should be included in the article's discussion about that bug, so that people can easily check to see if it has been resolved yet. Bayle Shanks 04:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that 2.0.0pre1 includes the new algorith, see [1] --128.214.182.228 (talk) 08:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Darcs-logo.png

Image:Darcs-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Performance

“Darcs has been criticized on the grounds of performance” Can it really be that much worse than Subversion? (^_^) I feel like as much of my time is wasted waiting on svn as actually working these days. --Malirath (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but darcs tends to lose out massively to the "new school" distributed RCSes like git, hg, bzr, etc. (PS: keep discussion focused on improving the article) -- intgr [talk] 20:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this isn't really true anymore in 2011 (and since 2010) though git is still faster (which is to be expected given its position and the army of developers using it and improving it) darcs is now comptetitive with all others DVCS. Of course it's also much faster than Subversion since it's one of the advantage of DVCS ! Jedai (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has been three years from now, if darcs is slow only when compared with git, then this line better be removed or rephrased, does other dvcs has special case which requires exponential time to handle merge conflict? --14.198.220.253 (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Darcs development motivation

The article states that the darcs was developed to replace traditional systems, however, in the Darcs Manual (1.0.9 rc1) following is written:

The development of a simplified theory of patches is what originally motivated me to create darcs.

It seems like the statement claimed by this article requires additional reference due to an obvious conflict with the official manual.--VictorAnyakin (talk) 09:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, that comes from the Darcs paper in the refs, Roundy's dissatisfaction with CVS. --Gwern (contribs) 15:36 10 July 2008 (GMT)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Darcs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]