Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilary DeCesare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary DeCesare[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. The refs are all sponsored or contributor articles, and I couldn't find better sources on a WP:BEFORE. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough coverage that's independent of the subject. Mentioned here [1], doesn't appear to be a Forbes Contributor piece, but it's barely a few paragraphs. Oaktree b (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is indeed a Forbes contributor blog post; click on the author or the little icon next to her name.Sam Kuru (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nomination. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. None of the existing sources are useful, as per Mr. Apples; it's all PR, advertorials, self-created directory listings. Searching for others leads to an amazing amount of PR and puff interviews, including many blackhat SEO blogs that are a pretty solid canary-in-the-coalmine for a manufactured presence. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.