Talk:Greenhouse gas inventory

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Carbon tax#Harmonized carbon taxes|harmonized global tax]] The anchor (#Harmonized carbon taxes) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Section sizes

Section size for Greenhouse gas inventory (22 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	1,344	1,344
Examples	802	802
Greenhouse gas emissions accounting	4,595	25,284
Comparison of production based and consumption-based accounting	4,948	4,948
Production-based accounting	5,901	5,901
Consumption-based accounting	2,718	2,718
Emissions embodied in international trade	7,122	7,122
Tools and standards	27	2,728
ISO 14064	537	537
Local Government Operations Protocol	2,164	2,164
Advantages of consumption-based accounting	459	6,434
Extending mitigation options	2,058	2,058
Increasing participation	1,605	1,605
Encompassing policies such as the CDM	2,312	2,312
Disadvantages of consumption-based accounting	343	2,514
Greater uncertainty and complexity	1,445	1,445
Greater international co-operation	726	726
Sharing emissions responsibility	2,901	2,901
Trends	1,914	1,914
See also	156	156
References	30	30
External links	1,176	1,176
Total	45,283	45,283

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greenhouse gas inventory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100601060839/http://www.theclimateregistry.org/resources/protocols/local-government-operations-protocol/ to http://www.theclimateregistry.org/resources/protocols/local-government-operations-protocol/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Greenhouse gas emissions accounting into Greenhouse gas inventory. I think that the content in the Greenhouse gas emissions accounting article can easily be explained in the context of Greenhouse gas inventory, and the Greenhouse gas inventory article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Greenhouse gas emissions accounting will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Short description does not quite match with hatnote

The short description "inventory of how much greenhous gases are emitted for a process" does not quite match with the hatnote "about inventorying greenhouse gases from countries,regions and cities". Not really sure what they should be but hopefully someone has an idea and can change one or both. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some small changes to the short description and to the hatnote, please see if you agree. EMsmile (talk) 12:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overlap with carbon footprint

I am currently working on the carbon footprint article which now also includes a bit on the issue of consumption-based accounting versus production-based accounting. I realised only today that some of the discussions around that are laid out quite nicely here. For anyone interested in this topic, please head over there to carbon footprint to help and to also ensure both articles fit well together. (it seems to me that this article is quite good and detailed but that it hasn't been updated with newer publications and data for a while). EMsmile (talk) 12:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the section of ==Emissions embodied in international trade==

The wording go as "Figure 1 and Table 3 show extent of emissions embodied in international trade and thus their importance when attempting emissions reductions. Figure 1 shows the international trade flows of the top 10 countries...." I'm wonderding what Figure is for here? Can anyone help enlighten me? Thanks. --ThomasYehYeh (talk) 08:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This probably needs tidying up as those figures were moved or deleted later? This article needs some work, I hadn't really paid attention to it before. Step 1 that I would to is to try and reorganise it to have standing main level headings. Pinging User:Dtetta and User:Chidgk1 in case they are interested. EMsmile (talk) 10:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have any problem falling asleep thanks Chidgk1 (talk) 14:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Em, I guess this means you are not interested in this article... I'll ask on the talk page of WikiProject climate change for advice on what to do with this article. It overlaps so much with others. EMsmile (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for the way forward

Copied from talk page of WikiProject Climate Change:

++++++++

I am struggeling with the article greenhouse gas inventory. It might contain some useful content but doesn't it overlap a lot with carbon footprint, carbon accounting and greenhouse gas emissions? Wondering if some of its content should be moved/condensed/updated and then the article could be re-focused. Pinging User:Dtetta. EMsmile (talk) 15:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree the article needs a lot of work. I think it should focus largely on national/international government inventory efforts. The production/consumption aspects could be shortened, IMO, buy they are still relevant to GHG inventory work. There is some overlap in these concepts, but that is what the “See also” links are for. I think they are largely distinct, and are all techniques in the more general field of measuring and assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Dtetta (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll copy your comments across to the talk page of greenhouse gas inventory and hope that someone will have time in future to work on this. I also think the production/consumption aspects could be shortened but I am undecided if bits should be deleted or merged into carbon footprint which also covers the production/consumption aspects. EMsmile (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

++++++++