Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Miles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Miles[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some of the sources such as this and this don't even mention Matthew Miles. Other sources are not WP:SIGCOV and unremarkable awards won. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Australia. LibStar (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
del 90% of article is puffery by association. - Altenmann >talk 23:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: nothing suggests this person is notable. S0091 (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable with off-target sources. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 08:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This article seems to be getting better, but is not there yet, and is in the middle of major edits. Please, can we hold open the discussion for a few more days? Bearian (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bearian it has not been edited since the 8th, right after it was nom'd and that was @Altenmann who removed some unsourced content then voted to delete it. S0091 (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Bearian (talk) 19:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I found zero relevant sources under Google books, scholar, and news. The current sources are not reliable. In 2006, folks might have been able to wiggle around like 9th graders, arguing that they didn't known the rules, but in 2024, everyone knows we are not a free web host. In other caes, they are reliable, but the information about the research or organization is at best tangentially related to the person. He appears to be on LinkedIn, and has 12,000 followers. Bearian (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.