Talk:Flo

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

On 11 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Flo (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Flo which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Flo (TV series) for this discussion. 162 etc. (talk) 16:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Flo (group) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Flo (group) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Post-move

https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Flo now shows for February 2.2k or 4.6k incoming views (?) of which 742 went to the ad character, 478 to the group, 115 TV series, 91 given name, and half a dozen other destinations. Let's see what happens in the following months. --Joy (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For April it shows 1.7k or 1.6k incoming views, again oddly inverted, but generally much less and closer so hopefully indicative of a positive trend. Outgoing there was 831 to the group, 312 to the ad character, 107 given name, 87 TV series, and then three more smaller destinations. --Joy (talk) 07:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In October '23, there were 835 incoming views, 581 identifiable - finally it's logical - of which 197 went to group (~23.6%), 138 to ad character (~16.5%), 92 to name (~11%), 64 TV series (~7.7%) and two more smaller destinations.

I also since noted Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation/Archive 55#effects of WP:NAMELIST on navigation outcomes for anthroponymy entries. --Joy (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raw trends for the popular topics: https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2022-06&end=2023-10&pages=Flo%7CFlo_(group)%7CFlo_(Progressive_Insurance)%7CFlo_(name)%7CFlo_(TV_series) - with the parenthetical disambiguation being used both here and organically, it's hard to see much. --Joy (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In January '24, we're at 842 total incoming, from which 464 total outgoing clickstreams could be identified, still scattering to group, ad character, name, TV series, app. --Joy (talk) 08:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]