Jump to content

Talk:Meme stock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 20:22, 19 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Finance & Investment}}, {{WikiProject Internet culture}}, {{WikiProject Economics}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk00:06, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that some meme stocks have become popular among retail investors after they had been targeted by professional short sellers, with the aim of causing losses among those firms? Source: Chung, Juliet (10 July 2021). "The Meme Stock Rally Hurt Melvin and Maplelane. It Hasn't Gotten Easier Since". Wall Street Journal. Phillips, Matt (3 June 2021). "AMC Cashes In on Meme Stock Mania, Raising $587 Million". The New York Times. Lynch, David J.; Shaban, Hamza; Denham, Hannah; Newmyer, Tory (January 27, 2021). "GameStop, AMC shares surge after Reddit users lead chaotic revolt against big Wall Street funds". The Washington Post. Retrieved 21 October 2021. Alloway, Tracy (27 January 2021). "How 'Flows Before Pros' Is Disrupting Stock Markets". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 20 October 2021.

Converted from a redirect by JBchrch (talk). Self-nominated at 14:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Epicgenius (talk) 00:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Epicgenius! JBchrch talk 01:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 to T:DYK/P6

"Intended to humble"

[edit]

CGBoas regarding this edit [1], where do you read that in the source? JBchrch talk 19:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page 3 of the document. CGBoas (talk) 19:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes right. I've updated the page number in the ref. JBchrch talk 19:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article Image

[edit]

@JBchrch: Fair enough in regards to your reason for removing the GameStop stock graph, but do you think that there should be a fitting image to go with this article? Maybe an example of a meme stock? Best, Tyrone Madera (talk) 18:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tyrone Madera: I've been trying to think about this since last night, and frankly, I have trouble coming up with something good or interesting. Ideally, I would like for the image to comply with MOS:LEADIMAGE according to which the image should "give readers visual confirmation that they've arrived at the right page". So exit, for instance, the WSB logo, the Gamestop logo or the AMC logo etc... Personally, I'm fine with having an unillstrated article. But if you have any ideas, feel free to be bold about it and/or we can discuss. JBchrch talk 01:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
JBchrch, What about an image under the History section? That wouldn't be a lede image. Tyrone Madera (talk) 04:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]