This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 15:34, 24 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Human rights}}, {{WikiProject Law}}, {{WikiProject Singapore}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:34, 24 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Human rights}}, {{WikiProject Law}}, {{WikiProject Singapore}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in October 2011. Further details are available here.
A fact from Remedies in Singapore constitutional law appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the SingaporeHigh Court(pictured) can grant the remedy of declaringvoid a law inconsistent with the Constitution enacted before its commencement, even though Article 4 seems to say otherwise?