Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indiavision news

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 15:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indiavision news

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. No sources cited except for web stat listing sites such as Alexa and Domaintools. Searches have failed to find any significant independent coverage. (Note: The article was created by a single purpose account, virtually all of whose edits concern indiavision. A PROD was contested by a single purpose IP which edits only in connection with indiavision, giving the edit summary "This is my popular web news site, kindly spare your spade of unnecessity [sic]." Both the account and the IP have long ago received several warnings as a result of adding apparent spam links to Indiavision news.) JamesBWatson (talk) 12:09, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The title of the artcle probably should be IndiaVision.com or Indiavision.com. See indiavision.com/privacy.html. I didn't find any reliable source information on IndiaVision.com. However, source information that I found about Indiavision television news channel on cable network includes: India Business Insight April 22, 2003, Business Line April 23, 2003, Hindu (India) March 27, 2005, New Indian Express October 21, 2009, Medianama June 3, 2010, Indiantelevision.com November 2, 2010, New Indian Express July 16, 2011]. I'm not sure if Indiavision television news channel and IndiaVision.com are related. There probably can be a Wikipedia article on Indiavision television news channel but not on IndiaVision.com since IndiaVision.com doesn't meet WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly UnDelete This domain and website is much older than the Indiavision tv, and this domain is in no way related to that channel, agreed.

the site is live since 6/8/1998 as per "whois records". and "wayback machine". {{cite web}}: Cite uses generic title (help) and very old and popular "Alexa Stats says the truth". . --Farhan.dastoor (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete age and alexa rankings do not make for a notability argument, I'm afraid. This does not appear to meet the standards for notability.--Talain (talk) 18:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do NoT Delete This site has over a million pages (Gignatic information is strrong basis for wiki`s existance principles), sufficient for its credibility and importance apart from age, So its a fit case for avoiding deletion.

--Qutubuddin (talk) 10:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

— Qutubuddin (talk • contribs) has so far made no other edits apart from this one.

Having a lot of pages stored on a web server is not an indication of notability. If you haven't done so yet, I suggest reading the notability guidelines. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.