Jump to content

User talk:Eocursor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Doug Weller (talk | contribs) at 07:53, 9 March 2024 (Dinosaur of Ta Prohm: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Eocursor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Heavy Water (talk) 17:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Heavy Water Thank you! Eocursor (talk) 19:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

kulindadromeus and Psittacosaurus had Feathers ?

[edit]

What are the references to The 2016 publication in the Journal of Geology in contrast finds that the integumentary structures found on Kulindadromeus and Psittacosaurus are highly deformed scales and not feather-like structures ? Dinomarek (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dinomarek: Why are you asking me? I haven't edited either Kulindadromeus or Psittacosaurus. Eocursor (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on Ica stones

[edit]

Just wondering if fraudulent archaeology is an interest of yours. Doug Weller talk 07:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Thank you very much! Yes, I like to research fraudulent archaeology. I think the Ica stones are quite neat as modern curiosities but it's unfortunate how such obvious fakes are spread around as real and might have counteracted real study of the few possibly authentic engraved stones found there and dilute understanding of Peruvian history. Eocursor (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, you need to know about the Fringe theories noticeboard. And join WP:Wikiproject Archaeology.And if you do Facebook, the Fraudulent Archaeology Wall of Shame.[1]. I don't know if you've read books by Ken Feder but he posts there. Doug Weller talk 12:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: Thank you for the tips! I've joined the archaeology project and I'll check in on the noticeboard. I don't use Facebook much and haven't read any of Feder's books (beyond the portions I cited in the article, which I found through Google Books) but I took a look at the Facebook group as well, lovely stuff. Eocursor (talk) 23:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a great group. They gave me some advice for my new article Archaeology and racism. Doug Weller talk 07:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wording

[edit]

Could you take a look at WP:HOWEVER and the rest of that page. This is one of the differences between writing an essay or journal article/book and a Wikipedia article. I didn't know this when I was new. Doug Weller talk 11:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: I've tried to work on removing the editorializing as good as I could, in some cases I think it is difficult not to have a "though" or "but" in there so let me know how it looks. Eocursor (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Ping me - type {{re|Doug Weller}} or use my talk page if you want advice/help. I've been doing this for 30 years or so. Doug Weller talk 12:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: Thank you! I'll be in touch if I run into any issues. Eocursor (talk) 23:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Do you have access to the Dravidosaurus discription?

[edit]

I saw your work on dravidosaurus and I'd like to see the original figures! DNB XD (talk) 10:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur of Ta Prohm

[edit]

Nice article but I've raised a couple of issues at WP:FTN#Dinosaur of Ta Prohm. Pinged you but wanted to make sure you saw it so posting now. Best to respond there rather than here. Doug Weller talk 07:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]