Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Kasmira Cryer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 15:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Kasmira Cryer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Current sources are either unreliable or merely passing mentions. I moved this page to draftspace in hopes of seeing improvements in the sources, but the author showed no interest in making changes and reverted it back. GSS ^💬 14:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Canada. GSS ^💬 14:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails notability guidelines. Sources used in the article are simply ROUTINE and interviews/conversations (especially with titles starting with "Meet "subject name"). Elsewhere are unreliable content with no GNG sources found. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 16:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom and WP:GNG. In my own WP:BEFORE, I find the same "passing mentions", interviews and unreliable sources (IMDB bio) that we find in the article. Which, just about, support the text we have. But do not materially contribute to notability. There is nothing to indicate that WP:CREATIVE is met (subject appears to be a filmmaker/producer - but not to the extent that is any more notable than anyone else in that job/role.) The apparent PROMO/COI/TONE/SPA issues do very little to help... Guliolopez (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Passing mentions per WP: BEFORE. There was no clear passing of WP: ENTERTAINER and WP: GNG. Otuọcha (talk) 06:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep[1], [2] and [3] are enough to support this article from deletion. As they are all reliable source. Thus pass GNG
102.91.46.13 (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It pass general notability of living as it has WP:THREE WP:SECONDARY which are [4], [5] and [6] TMdydxca (talk) 10:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: TMdydxca (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]
Delete. Of the three sources mentioned above, one's a press release and the other an interview. Fails WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 11:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would have suggested Draftifying the article due to the tone issues ("committed" and "passionate" - reads like a LinkedIn page!) and lack of reliable sources, but I see from the nominator that this has already been done and reverted. Current sources are mostly press releases and passing mentions, not meeting WP:SIGCOV. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.