User talk:RealmUnknown

This is RealmUnknown's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Armenante (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:André Armenante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review, will look for more suitable sources and publications to correct this draft. RealmUnknown (talk) 11:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RealmUnknown! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interests

Hi. Please would you read WP:Paid editing and WP:Conflict of interest and ensure that you are complying with required components. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, sure thing RealmUnknown (talk) 21:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upon review, I can comfortably say that I do comply in the sense that I am not paid nor affiliated with the individual the article is about. However, I am not entirely sure how to proceed if there are issues surrounding it. This particular article is more or less my "first attempt" in making a fresh article from the ground up. RealmUnknown (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Armenante (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft still reads like a CV. Better neutrality of several statements including section headings is required. See: WP:Writing better articles. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for the review! I'll take another crack at it with a more neutral lens. Was utilizing other article archetypes as a general bases of understanding flow and potential section content; such as other magicians and entertainers who have articles on the site. RealmUnknown (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:André Armenante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Armenante (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anuwrites was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the given references covers the person. Just slight mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:André Armenante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ANU^writes 22:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review!

I do agree that some of the sources are a brief in discussing the subject. However, The Genii and NBC sources are full interviews/articles with the subject. While the others are included for sourcing with the awards, creations, copyrights, etc directly about the subject or the subject's materials. HolograFX being the main staple, thus resulted in the most sources that I could locate from online archives and searches.

Thanks again, will see if I can dig up any other interviews or articles relating to the subject. RealmUnknown (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]