User talk:Weggie
|
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Dude - you owe me a new keyboard! That 'pic of the month' is only hilarious :-) Yes - down with all those forddin' games, I say!! - Alison☺ 00:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
I dont understand why this is raising a SPAM issue?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Construct_Deep_Linking
There is no external links pointing or and to the article. This is a brand new technique of taking "rich user experience" and "organic search" and combining the two by using the CDL implementation. It has never been done and will change the way a lot of developers will create their sites. I shared all the technical specifications in order to assist the general public with this knowledge. If there is any way I can improve the article, I am open to suggestions. Is not benefiting any organisation nor is it promoting any product, CDL is just a name that was given to it.
Regards, n. coetzeen 15:01:19, 8 April 2007 n.
PC
[1] - Kittybrewster 22:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Kate Lagan
someone has removed the the speedy delete tag. Go ahead and AfD it if you wish, you would have my support. She wasnt elected as an MLA so doesnt carry state/province notability.--Vintagekits 14:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Ok - will set up tonight Weggie 15:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
hey
Why do you insist on taking the entry for my boss Robert Coulter and converting it into an entry for a politician?
Make your own entry for him, or just give up this one and let's both start our own stuff.
- No offence intended but I believe your article was deleted as a non-notable biography (see WP:NOTABILITY) so I didn't delete anything myself. I should seek advice on how to proceed from an Administrator on whether you can re-add the article as there are specific rules which I'm not too sure about. However, please do not make any changes to the Coulter article as there are now 'load' of wikilinks to this article which will be corrupted. I will add a link to your new page if you are allowed to re-add it so that it will be easy to find your Coulter. Hope this helps Weggie 19:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- See here. I've already left a comprehensive rebuttal on the talk page. One Night In Hackney303 16:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- No offence intended but I believe your article was deleted as a non-notable biography (see WP:NOTABILITY) so I didn't delete anything myself. I should seek advice on how to proceed from an Administrator on whether you can re-add the article as there are specific rules which I'm not too sure about. However, please do not make any changes to the Coulter article as there are now 'load' of wikilinks to this article which will be corrupted. I will add a link to your new page if you are allowed to re-add it so that it will be easy to find your Coulter. Hope this helps Weggie 19:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Please dont remove the categories from articles without prior discussing on the talk page. Okkar 16:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I hope my edit summary history will provide the reason for the change. happy to answer any questions on the rationale on the article talk page. Weggie 17:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. If you want this deleted, could I suggest taking it to WP:AFD? - Richard Cavell 05:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I fixed this up for you. - Richard Cavell 22:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Brian Nelson
I'm currently working on a page for him, which should be finished in the next couple of days. However I'm a bit worried about what to call the page, as even titling it could have POV problems. The Brian Nelson disambiguation page currently points to Brian Nelson (terrorist) which is obviously a non-starter. Brian Nelson (loyalist) is possible, but I'm concerned that gives the impression that all loyalists colluded with the security forces, so I was thinking Brian Nelson (British agent)? Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 20:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- The issue is disputed and WP:BLP applies here - I suggest something locational (Northern Ireland). Weggie 22:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, offline publication, and other tasks.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 01:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007
The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for helping to populate this! Johnbod 20:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
DUP logo in the infobox
I'm no expert on image copyright rules, but I can't see any justification for using the logos in the articles on members of the parties. It seems pretty clear to me that they are only fair use in the articles on the parties, or in an article which specifically discusses the logo, should there be one. Warofdreams talk 11:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
3RR
I have reported you for breaching the 3 revert rule, details are here. One Night In Hackney303 14:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- While your WP:3RR block was declined, I am going to reccomend that you read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA as a good measure to make sure you do not get blocked for uncivil behavior. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Lucie Blackman
Hi, I posted on the talkpage concerning the "prostitution in Japan" link, but I didn't revert your edit (sadly that seems to be the only way to call users' attention to the talk page) so maybe it went by you unnoticed? Anyways, I would much appreciate your views on the subject. Thank you in advance, Mackan 19:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies, I did miss it - I've replied now though. Cheers Weggie 19:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Regarding edits to Ruswarp
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Weggie! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \.photobucket\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)