User talk:Florisdkw

This is Florisdkw's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Florisdkw! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raquel García Hermida-van der Walle (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raquel García Hermida-van der Walle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Florisdkw! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Florisdkw. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Raquel García Hermida-van der Walle, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks a lot for this! Very valid points. I have added extra sources to show significance (although there seems to be a cool down period). The subject is currently well within polling range to be elected in the Netherlands as an MEP in the upcoming EU elections, so I think it's fair to add her page. With regards to the COI, I think you are right. She's a politician of a political party that I support, even though I think the article is exclusively factual and quite concise. (I am not paid or so.) How should I go about disclosing this? Thanks again, and please excuse my newcomer mistakes. Florisdkw (talk) 10:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If your only connection is that you and her support the same party, I don't think that alone gives rise to a COI. My query was more based on the fact that you've created, pretty much as your first edits, this article both here and on the Dutch Wikipedia, which implies you have more than just a passing interest in the subject. Also, you uploaded an image of her, with a comment saying you obtained it via private correspondence, which again suggests an external relationship of some sort? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Yes, I completely understand your point. And we are in more frequent contact than just shared party membership (though I am not paid or employed or so), I also explicitly asked her support and permission for creating an article about her. Reading the COI guidelines I am not sure whether I can/should proceed or just delete them (even though I consider them objectively informative) to avoid violating them. Is there a way to disclose my COI? If you think I should delete them, I will! Sorry for all this, no bad intentions.. 213.202.47.52 (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My advice in unclear or borderline cases is always to disclose, rather than not, because nobody can be sanctioned for disclosing when they strictly speaking didn't need to, but not disclosing when you did need to can get you into trouble. But at the end of the day, it's your call, as only you know the precise nature of your relationship.

The instructions for disclosing are at the top of this section, the 3rd bullet point starting 'disclose'. It's a question of placing a template either on your own user page, or on the talk page of every draft/article to which the COI pertains, or both. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning @DoubleGrazing, thanks again for flagging this and being vigilant in picking this up. I just added the disclosure using the template you referred to. I'll add some additional independent sources to the page, but I understand if the article is not accepted in the end. Florisdkw (talk) 11:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]