Jump to content

Talk:Roger Cloutier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 182.239.146.143 (talk) at 10:54, 27 March 2024 (NATO not a proofen source of Appearance). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Mariupol

On RT.COM they said that he is there. 178.220.80.160 (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which means he isn't. 77.234.77.153 (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully he's in the same place Ayatollah Mike is in ... hell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.28.7.186 (talk) 07:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-cloutier-captured-idUSL2N2W914L He is not captured, after all. I'm sorry, I don't know English very well, so here's the factcheck and you can read the rest yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.81.213.255 (talk) 06:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appereance

Was he seen in the last two weeks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.185.42.17 (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in Izyum Turkey giving a speech at a NATO event. Confirmed by NATO spokesperson, NATO facebook page photos and his own LinkedIn page photos. If Russia says he's captured you can pretty much guarantee he isnt. MartyKopka (talk) 06:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NATO not a proofen source of Appearance

As NATO is since Ramstein meeting on 26. april 2022 one of the weapon suppliers its not a credible source. There is a big chance that Cloutier in deed still is in Mariupol and that thats the reason why they dont give up. There is no independent proof yet that he s not captured there, a LinkedIn(!) profile is not a credible source as it is not posted by himself. And the sources all guide to Nato. 178.220.80.160 (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple reliable sources describe this rumor as false. If you are aware of any reliable sources that disagree, or which question the authorship of the LinkedIn posts, please share those sources here so that other editors can check them out. Squeakachu (talk) 22:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind about claims, has anybody actually seen this guy since 2022? 182.239.146.143 (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]