Talk:Analytical psychology
 | Daily page views
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Analytical psychology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Perspective from mainstream psychology?
[edit]The Criticism section of the article only cites criticism from within the psychoanalytical movement and some ad hominem attacks. In my opinion, the article desperately needs a section that would juxtapose Jungian psychology with mainstream psychology, especially in the areas where they interact (extraversion-introversion, psychological testing, efficacy of therapy etc.) 91.238.85.132 (talk) 13:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Move ref 144 original text to footnote
[edit]"("Le concept jungien d'inconscient collectif "témoigne également de la facilité avec laquelle on peut glisser du concept d'inconscient psychologique vers des perspectives relevant d'un univers de pensée étranger à la tradition philosophique et scientifique dans laquelle ce concept est né'")" This part of the article should probably be a footnote to the attached reference, and not appear as full in-text information. I tend to break references when I try to mess with them, so could someone else do this? Thank you. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 00:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)