Talk:All Grown Up!

There was a short discussion on Nickdisk about what time frame AGU occurs in. Despite the continuity and universe issues inherent in Rugrats Go Wild!, the consensus (at least among a few fans) is that like Rugrats, it will occur in some unspecified present day. -- knoodelhed 20:48, 12 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Whoa

there has been a lot of changes here...definitely abused..

Pot Smoking

I didn't know there was pot smoking on this show, ause' thats what the article says. (Comment by User:68.193.103.52)

An annonymous user just posted it. Because of that sentence, I am moving it here until i can be verified. (None of the episodes I have watched include it.) Sonic Mew 12:12, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

I thought you got here a little quick...You added it! An explanation, please? Sonic Mew 12:14, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

I did not add that I swear! (Comment by User:68.193.103.52)

I think you did. And it is easy to proove that you did. Sonic Mew 14:27, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Controversy

'This show is highly controversial because it addresses many teen issues (many pubescent) to young children. Also, on the show the characters smoke pot in nearly every episode. Parents do not like this.

There's NOOO pot smoking in All Grown Up! Klasky Csupo would never do that and Nickelodeon would never air that!

Age

Can you tell me how old the characters are?

Angelica and Susie are 13. Tommy, Kimi, Lil, and Phil are 11. Chuckie is 12. Dil is 10. Lou is 100.

?????

I don't know if this show is that good. I mean, when young children see another kid at their age acting like a teenager, they will act like teenagers too.

I have to agree with this person the rugrats seem to be in more advanced social situations then my friends and i to spite the fact we are sophmores in highschool. march 3, 2006

That's ridiculous. It's a G-ratted kiddy show. Where do you go to High School? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.19.244.178 (talk) 07:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC).

Actually, it is not very good because it is stupid, anti-snob, politically correct BULLSHIT! See history for November 14 for more information.

Criticism...

The criticism section is totally off base. First of all "twisting characters personalities too far"? And then the example cited is Susie as a baby had a different life goal from Suzie as a teenager? Of course she does! People change their life goals hundreds of times in their lifetime. Not to mention the fact that almost no one remembers their life as a baby, so she probably doesn't remember her original goal was to be a doctor. I for one can't rememember anything from before I was 5.

Next off the social themes are spot on. That's exactly how kids are these days. And then once again, the example cited is totally off base. Tommy getting his first kiss is not unusual for his age group (and being 10/11 somehow make him "underage"? I've got news for you, there's no set age for your first kiss). Kids have their first kiss on average, around the age of 11-ish (give or take). And 13 year olds have their own cell phones, piercings, and talk about sex and whatnot on a regular basis. This is how kids are these days, you don't have to like it, but it's a fact of life.

Not to mention the fact that this show isn't just aimed at kids, it's also aimed at the people who grew up with Rugrats, a show that was on for (give or take) 13 years. So if you were 1 when you started watching the Rugrats series, and you grew up as a fan, you're just the right age to appreciate the show now. --Venomaru 22:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

I still think the show is premoting a liberal lifestyle among children. Familyguyfan1990 June 9 2006

New Characters

Should Harold be on the list of new characters? I know he was in at least 1 episode of Rugrats(where Angelica has a playdate with him and makes him her assistant). TJ Spyke 23:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Watch All Grown Up on NICK !

WHY ARE YOU WHACKING ME WITH THE PILLOW ? WHAT ? I WAS PRACTICING MY SWING . UH ' POLICY MONITOR .

Criticism again

Regardless of the merits of the criticism section, it is entirely unreferenced, and therefore could well be original research. Unless someone can supply notable analytical sources for these criticisms, the section needs to be removed. Brendan Moody 17:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Airings

I have tagged the "Airings" section as a disputed section, as I feel the info is suspect. If someone can give a source, please do. Otherwise, this section should be changed or deleted. There are some people at the Nickdisk board ([1]) who are actually taking this as gospel, and unless there is tangible proof, it should be changed or gone. -- azumanga 02:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)