Talk:LPP (company)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of LPP from pl.wikipedia. |
Untitled
[edit]Most of this page is Google Translated and grammar checked from the version in Polish Wikipedia
In terms of "notability", I found it odd that a retailer (Reserved) that is on pretty much every high street and shopping centre in Poland wasn't mentioned on Wikipedia. Then realised that its sister brands (also high profile) weren't listed (especially when less prominent or defunct retailers are). Rather than list them all individually (and with little detail) I put the overall company on (much like Zara's Inditex) and that at least gave it some detail.
Also, as one of Poland's (and Poland being one of the biggest economies in the former eastern Europe) biggest companies (the WIG30), I was surprised it wasn't listed in Wikipedia (and then noticed that a few others in that list weren't either - so I think that others should probably be translated too). Escottf (talk) 21:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
One fact you definitely did not know about SiNSAY
[edit]They make horrible english clothing. They completely don't know english. They literally stand as a direct competitor to Next Poland division. And a fact about a store near me: when it opened in 2020, it played chill instrumental house music. But somewhere in 2021, they began playing licensed music, that I had a daily fill of already, because I listen to some radio stations a lot, so it is pretty annoying. :-( 2A02:2378:121E:6174:0:0:0:1 (talk) 08:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
article written by LPP themselves
[edit]the article clearly favors LPP and avoids important topics that would put the company in negative light, such as the death of 1000+ workers producing their clothes in Bangladesh and the company's denial of the event until 2015. it's a direct translation of the polish article. the sources for the article are mostly LPP's own websites and articles. never mentions any controversies. The entire article is biased and needs to be reworked. Molleston (talk) 22:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)