Jump to content

Talk:Jewish Bolshevism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:5c6:100:3ab0:2ce9:c58b:2f1b:2f9b (talk) at 12:24, 14 April 2024. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

genealogy site

used to support location restrictions: [1] Elinruby (talk) 05:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elinruby if you remove a source you also have to add a citation needed tag in its place because there's no guarantee that the next source contains the information before the previous citation, unless you checked it yourself. (t · c) buidhe 05:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Buidhe and you of course assume I haven't, nor have you checked yourself. Never mind though, go you. I am glad you are using talk pages now. Elinruby (talk) 05:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Who could live outside the Pale of Settlement?". Jewish Family Search. 3 May 2014. Archived from the original on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 19 August 2015.

Biased source

There is a line under the Analysis header, saying among other things "Researchers in the field such as Polish philosopher Stanisław Krajewski". Krajewski is indeed a philosopher, but he's also an activist for the Jewish cause, as noted on his article page, so using him as a source to debunk a claim against the Jewish cause is probably NPOV. 100.16.5.2 (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced material is used in a misleading way

Under the section under Jewish involvement in Russian Communism it is stated "Russian President Vladimir Putin erroneously said:

"The decision to nationalize the library was made by the first Soviet government, and Jews were approximately 80–85% members".

Nothing in the source material stated that his statement is erroneous, the source material only states that he said the statement. please remove the word erroneous. 41.13.94.85 (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep reading. The article already explains this. Grayfell (talk) 02:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the word, which is SYNTH. It is fine to follow the statement by noting that other sources indicate the statement to be false, but it is not ok to write that in our own voice. This is not about the facts, but just basic wikicraft. We report reliable sources; we don't give our own opinions of them. Zerotalk 04:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can you claim unbiased facts when you use terms such as ignorant. Either your am editorial or 2601:5C6:100:3AB0:2CE9:C58B:2F1B:2F9B (talk) 12:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]