Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Bonjawo

Jacques Bonjawo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources here are primary and there is only sources about quotes online. I think this is not enough to scratch notability yet. Cleo Cooper (talk) 00:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G11. Pure puffery, no evidence of notability. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 00:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello. I understand your point but if you check the link to the Microsoft Alumni website, you will see that all information's in my page are mentioned. I hope you known Microsoft Alumni is an association for Previous Microsoft Members. Emmanuel T. (talk) 06:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Science, Technology, Computing, Cameroon, Washington, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i've just Updated the sources by adding a direct link for the Microsoft Alumni website. the link shows 80% of the information's on my page are verified. Emmanuel T. (talk) 06:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: PROMO. Independent sources don't count towards notability and the association with Microsoft is a name drop. I don't find sourcing for this person otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 14:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All the link's in the article show that he did not just collaborate with Microsoft but he worked there for almost ten years. I don't really understand your point and i don't think saying the truth can be considered as a kind of PROMO. check the link below

[1]https://www.microsoftalumni.com/s/1769/19/interior.aspx?sid=1769&gid=2&pgid=3131 Emmanuel T. (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i don't really understand what is wrong about this article sources. as for me, all the sources shows notability of the article. Mercury Dev'sCartele dev's (talk) 08:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A book review (?) here: [2], but still not enough for author notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
your link show's his old books while the article is talking about his recent books. I think the link's of his recent books available contains all the necessary information's for author notability. Mercury Dev'sCartele dev's (talk) 22:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete complete and utter vanity spam dumpster filled to the brim with garbage (fake, black hat seo) dourding a surprise to exactly no one. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]