Jump to content

User talk:Artsfounation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 12:02, 4 May 2024 (Fixing Lint errors (Task 29)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

December 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Themfromspace (talk) 05:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I disagree with the above message. There is potential for a conflict of interest with your edits, under the likely assumption that you have a connection with the Foundation, but I think your edits so far have been reasonable. You might like to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#Artsfoundation.-gadfium 09:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your interest in my edits. Yes I do work for the Arts Foundation of New Zealand and we would like to share the research we have done on the artists we have given awards to. Each artist we award and celebrate is given a profile page, containing bibliographic information, on our website. We maintain these pages through direct contact with the artist. It is not viable for us to duplicate this large amount of information on Wikipedia and keep it up to date. This is the reason I have added an external link to the specific profile page of the artist on our website. Thank you for your consideration of this, we would welcome any suggestions for improvement.Artsfounation (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For starters you might stop distorting articles by deleting material which provides balance but which apparently doesn't accord with your provincial outlook or shill agenda. Example: your deletion of the published criticism of the work of Miles Warren in his entry 23 December 2008 to accord with the publication of his biography by Canterbury University. The deletion has been reversed. Engleham (talk) 07:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Hu12 (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://.thearts.co.nz

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block.

--Hu12 (talk) 16:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]