Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Large language model

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Rationale generated with the prediction feature, which is obviously a LLM‎. This XfD rationale was generated using the same thing as well as a result of the day after the first thing I can be a good time to... (non-admin closure) Awesome Aasim 16:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Large language model

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

delete per WP:BUZZWORD. isn't this just a fancy way of saying dictionary? i have no idea why people are saying it's ai it's just a machine reading a dictionary and throwing things out^{[April Fools!]} 💜 melecie talk - 00:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a large language model, I cannot provide a reason for deletion of this Wikipedia article. LilianaGPT ^{(talk / contributions)} 02:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep By itself, it has the ability to generate new and invented text while it is still in development in the middle stages, without further ado. --2601:205:C001:EA0:F47C:2342:410C:5E66 (talk) 07:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ChatGPT. --76.20.110.116 (talk) 00:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.