Talk:Battleship

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battleship article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 120 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Battleship is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 14, 2007.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 10, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
February 11, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
March 10, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
March 16, 2007	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
April 21, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted
September 13, 2009	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Featured article

Military history: Maritime / World War I / World War II / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

"Full Speed Ahead and Damn the Torpedoes"

This article states, "Unlike the ship of the line, the battleships of the late 19th and early 20th centuries had significant vulnerability to torpedoes and mines..." Wooden warships were indeed vulnerable to torpedoes (although they what we would call mines today). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.131.189 (talk) 17:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I would take it to mean, before mines were invented, there was no hazard, but clarification would be good. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 17:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Agamemnon

the caption for the diagram of HMS Agamemnon says that she was typical of later predreadnoughts, which is not true. There was ONE other class of predreadnoughts with an intermediate battery of similar caliber, and it was british as well. American and Italian Vessels had 8" secondary while Japanese had 10", only england used 9.2" I think the caption should be changed to say that she was typical of later british predreadnoughts. Wandavianempire (talk) 20:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“Major intimitation factor”

Is this a misspelling of intimidation? 2607:FEA8:8760:A900:1BE:E642:694E:8A15 (talk) 17:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that looks like a typo or other error. It's fixed now. Thanks -Fnlayson (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

idk

213.1.218.58 (talk) 12:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]