Talk:LinuxCNC

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Enhanced Machine Controller Needs to be aliased with EMC and EMC2 for the wikipedia search box.

PLEASE can who ever added the 'delete process request box' explain WHY they think that an article on one of the most popular CNC control systems should be excluded from wikipedia. Simply linking to a generic rules page makes no sense when the REASON for wanting to delete a particular article is not 'obvious'. MANY articles relating to popular activities have been removed from wikipedia on the grounds that they 'are not noteworthy enough', but half of the problem is the fact that they can not be tagged as alternatives to other options because those articles have been blocked as well. Personally I've given up bothering to contribute to wikipedia simply because of this arrogant attitude to content but on this occasion I feel that something needs to be said! Lsces (talk) 06:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If someone knows more about the links to Robocrane and the common history of EMC with Robocrane, then please contribute to the history section! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.27.61.165 (talk) 07:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on LinuxCNC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]