Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egungun of Lagos
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Egungun of Lagos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article don’t have reliable sourced references, the articles looks like an autobiography and subject is not notable to be included on Wikipedia as a BLP article. I think it should be deleted Madeforall1 (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 3. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Looks like a bad faith nomination. Meets WP:GNG and slightly WP:ENT. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Article is poorly reference and no significant of notability just social media articles and no reliable coverage about this personMadeforall1 (talk) 07:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)- you can't vote twice since you nominated this. Delete it or I should strike it. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Struck. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- you can't vote twice since you nominated this. Delete it or I should strike it. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: This nomination was made because I declined to help with an article (Diff). They think that their article was nominated for deletion wrongly. (Diff) Away from that, the sources in the article meet the GNG. A WP:BEFORE can confirm this but of course, the nominator did not do this. Best, Reading Beans 07:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: While the article and referencing are not perfect there is sufficient to retain the article. Bad faith retaliatory nomination and purely disruptive. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)