Talk:Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
QUOROM_flow_chart article
[edit]I've merged the QUOROM_flow_chart page into the #History section of this article, since it was a stub and doesn't really make sense on its own. I think this is uncontroversial, but happy to discuss if people think it wa a useful stand-alone. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 03:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- The merge looks like an improvement to me, thanks. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}
04:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Intro wording
[edit]This sounds a bit strange: Researchers have to figure out research objectives that answer the research question, states the keywords, a set of exclusion and inclusion criteria. In the review stage, relevant articles were searched, irrelevant ones are removed. Staffansvensson (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Typo in figure
[edit]Missing "i" in "if", last box of
![PRISMA flow diagram](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5d/PRISMA_flow_diagram.jpg/300px-PRISMA_flow_diagram.jpg)
.