Talk:Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

QUOROM_flow_chart article

I've merged the QUOROM_flow_chart page into the #History section of this article, since it was a stub and doesn't really make sense on its own. I think this is uncontroversial, but happy to discuss if people think it wa a useful stand-alone. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 03:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The merge looks like an improvement to me, thanks. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 04:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intro wording

This sounds a bit strange: Researchers have to figure out research objectives that answer the research question, states the keywords, a set of exclusion and inclusion criteria. In the review stage, relevant articles were searched, irrelevant ones are removed. Staffansvensson (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in figure

Missing "i" in "if", last box of

.