User talk:Nrcprm2026

; Archives
	19 Dec'05 - 10 Feb'06; 12 Feb'06 - 11 Apr'06; 12 Apr'06 - 30 Mar'07;

Welcome! Please append new items below. I'll reply on your talk page, and here too, if I think other people might care about the reply. Thank you.

Note: Nrcprm2026's comments on Wikipedia are a work in progress, subject to the thread-mode disclaimer.

Thanks also to those who have asked me here.

--James S. 17 December 2005

Global warming

I enjoy your suggestions for Global warming. I think your suggestion should be adopted. Could you please go to the mediation page, and post some thoughts. the mediation is on exactly this issue, whether alternate views have the right to be added, without being excluded by the same small group several times. Thanks. --Sm8900 13:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also enjoy your suggestions, as the financial impacts are an important aspect of the effects of AGW. Don't be put off by the squabbles between the scientists and the ones trying to dilute the findings by whatever means possible. Your contributions, in the right place, can be of great benefit. Indeed, through the discussion you helped move forward, I have learned about aspects of the Stern report and its criticism that had not previously made its way to my attention. Your quest for the truth is welcomed, and keep in mind that mine has led me to alter and refine my position over time as trustworthy peer-reviewed information became available (or was presented to me). Cheers, --Skyemoor 11:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you dont provide diffs

To UBeR how can he see if he deleted something? Just calling him a liar is not helpful. Try some kindness!--Blue Tie 01:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who actually deleted the peer-reviewed scientific review against his press release, don't you feel like he set you up? James S. 01:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did I delete a cite? I did not mean to do so. And if I did it, no one set me up.. it was my own doing. But if I did something wrong, please tell me. I would try to make it right. I hope I did not do something to upset you. --Blue Tie 01:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GW

Your last edit to GW added a new sentence to the politics section. As we are minimizing this material in this article and only providing a short summary of GW controversy, put this material in the latter article to help us keep the GW article manageable. --Skyemoor 14:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Global Warming article ban

Based on your recent edits to Global warming, I am invoking your probation in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Depleted uranium and banning you from the article for 3 months. Thatcher131 02:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what the issues that caused this are. I know you feel passionately and maybe there are things you have in mind that are useful to the article. I have not paid attention so I do not know for sure. If you have concerns on that page, you may present them on the talk page or on my page, and I shall try to see that your views are not completely ignored if I can. --Blue Tie 03:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From T's talk: Accusations of disruption are personal attacks - since you've just been blocked for disruption, I don't think you've got a leg to stand on. But if you really want to follow up your baseless COI report with a baseless PA report, please do William M. Connolley 16:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please help improve Plug-in hybrid

You are listed as a participant in WikiProject Energy development, so I am asking you to please consider helping to improve the plug-in hybrid article. This is an ad hoc article improvement drive. BenB4 08:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]