User talk:Dlaska
July 2024
Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @MrOllie. My intention was to remove all the irrelevant, obsolete and clearly false parts. I also extended the description of the application context and features. I tried to adhere to the objectivity principle. If you think that you can further improve the new content, please do so, instead of reversing it to the previous version. Thank you. Dlaska (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- You clearly replaced the existing article with an obviously promotional one. Reverting to the old version of the article was an improvement - when an article takes such an obvious step towards promotionalism, it is not up to others to fix the problems you created. MrOllie (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am a LabPlot team member and I want to base the content exclusively on easily verifiable facts. Please, describe clearly what parts of the article are, in your opinion, 'obviously promotional', and require further edition. On your request I can provide all relevant references. Dlaska (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Have a read of WP:COI, then. As a team member you should not have been editing the Wikipedia article in the first place. MrOllie (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have edited the article again to remove all disputable phrases and the external links. Dlaska (talk) 20:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Have a read of WP:COI, then. As a team member you should not have been editing the Wikipedia article in the first place. MrOllie (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am a LabPlot team member and I want to base the content exclusively on easily verifiable facts. Please, describe clearly what parts of the article are, in your opinion, 'obviously promotional', and require further edition. On your request I can provide all relevant references. Dlaska (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- You clearly replaced the existing article with an obviously promotional one. Reverting to the old version of the article was an improvement - when an article takes such an obvious step towards promotionalism, it is not up to others to fix the problems you created. MrOllie (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm MarksmanRifle. I noticed that you recently removed content from LabPlot without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MarksmanRifle (talk) 20:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)