Jump to content

Template talk:Theresa May

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 21:06, 28 July 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Errors

[edit]

On some pages, such as Nasty Party, under the Family section, the word "husband" is displayed as "huaband".

There were a couple of errors in the early versions of this template, so you probably need to refresh the page. This is Paul (talk) 11:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christian democracy

[edit]

I notice the subject Christian democracy has been added to the Politics section a couple of times. I have Googled the topics "Theresa May" and "Christian democracy" a few times, but could find nothing significant, so I've removed it. I suspect the label has much to do with comparisons to Angela Merkel, who of course, is a Christian Democrat. I don't think we should restore Christian democracy to the template until and unless she becomes heavily associated with it, or unless we can gain consensus on it. Please feel free to add any thoughts on this matter. Thanks, This is Paul (talk) 12:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree with Paul's comments above. The Conservative Party is not a "Christian Democrat" Party. I suspect the person adding this subject has little real understanding of UK politics. David J Johnson (talk) 12:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

[edit]

I notice this template has been expanded quite a lot in recent times, but I'm a bit concerned not all the additions are directly May related, rather things that happened during her time at the Home Office and in Downing Street. Prime Minister templates tend to restrict themselves to major events in which the subject played a part (like Template:David Cameron. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? This is Paul (talk) 13:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree far to much and with sections hidden nobody is really going to use it for navigation. A cull back to Cameron size is probably called for. MilborneOne (talk) 14:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]