User talk:PaulWicks

	Archives
	1

Welcome!

Hello, PaulWicks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Burgundavia 10:55, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

Administrator

PaulWicks, I have nominated you for adminship at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PaulWicks Arichperson 23:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Camberwell links

Hi Paul

OK - I do appreciate your comments and they way they were made. My prime motive for visiting the page was to remove the Knowhere guide link as this can probably be called spam by most. However while there I looked at the other links in view of WP:EL. Bus route stuff (& similar transport issues) to me really are directory things that I understand are not encyclopedic. Rightly or wrongly (& I really am happy to have a dialogue about this) I have tended to consider academic entries ok and corporate ones definitely not. The others - ok I'll be awkward - what do you think is reasonable (in view of WP:EL)? The language class does look questionable - I was working through a batch at the time - but I will take no action at all until I hear from you & I certainly will not fall out with anyone I'm having a discussion with! Look forward to hearing from you and all the best -- Nigel ^(Talk) 12:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul

Thanks for the feedback. We can happily agree the language one goes I think. I'll look through the pages that you have mentioned (so I will/have removed links on but get back to me if you don't feel it's appropriate). All in all I would rather read them properly than comment too much now. However another editor raised concerns about external links being removed and there is a thread here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#External links on town pages that you may wish to look at as well - it certainly filled in some gaps in my understanding.

I'll get back to you when I've looked properly. Regards -- Nigel ^(Talk)

It really is a thorny one - some days I look at it and think - all links can go! However there is a role for worthwhile relevant links in Wiki - the problem is getting agreement on what they are. For me I'm happy with Camberwell as it stand now but if you see it differently feel free to let me know (or if you find you want an opinion on something similar in the course of your travels). I appreciate the dialogue with you - regards --Nigel ^(Talk) 12:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Paul the day got away from me. Based on your local knowledge of the relevance of that link I have no problem with it at all - I certainly will not remove it - all the best --Nigel ^(Talk) 18:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I took the pic down beacause I could not see it. IF you could see it go ahead and put it back up. I am sorry if I have made some confusion. Have a nice day--Seadog.M.S 12:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dissociation

Hello Paul, thanks for complimenting me on the description of single dissociation - I'll pass it on to E. Bruce Goldstein ;) Btw, yours wasn't too bad either. Let's give the article a little time so that others can join in and improve it with us. I'm always a bit timid, because English is, as you may have noticed, not my first language. --Arno Matthias 17:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lymphedema

try reload, the images are looking ~~fine~~ ... i mean I can see em all right -- Chris 73 | Talk 15:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried refreshing the cache? (CTRL F5 in IE)-- Chris 73 | Talk 17:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then I don't known. It is still displaying all right for me. Have you tried a different computer? Updated Firefox? Do you have an advertising-blocker that could block the image? Just some random guesses. Good Luck -- Chris 73 | Talk 21:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brain-computer interface

Nice picture! Looks like the article is in track to reach GA status. Appreciate the assistance you've been offer as a scientist, my own knowlege of neuroscience, shall we say is somewhat incomplete. Cheers Saganaki- 04:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reached GA status. I'm going to move forward to a featured article review. Be brilliant if you can stay on the case. Tks --Saganaki- 13:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dissociations

Paul,

I recently noticed there is no Wikipedia entry for "Double Dissociation", but I did find the Dissociation (neuropsychology) page. I noticed in its history that you had tagged the article as a stub. I've just posted a comment on the Talk page there about a brief sketch of how I propose to expand it. However, I'm also concerned whether the article would be appropriately titled after I do so. Double dissociation is an important topic in neuropsychology, but it is really more of an experimental design topic that applies generally to the experimental sciences.

I think I can do a decent job adding content to the page, and I don't think the page is terribly useful in its current stub form, but I would like advice both after I've made my edits and more importantly about the categorization issue (is this a neuropsychology topic or a more general topic). I plan to watch the page (and its Talk page) for a week or so and then make edits. If you have a chance to "watch my back" I'd appreciate it.

Incidentally, I am a physiological psychologist.

SJS1971 16:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beck Depression Inventory

The article Beck Depression Inventory you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Beck Depression Inventory for eventual comments about the article. Good luck in future nominations. Twinxor t 10:08, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, thanks for your excellent contributions to this article. It is very much appreciated. I am so impressed with your efforts I would like to offer you a BarnstarCshay 05:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

conversion disorder

Hi Paul- I will try and get round to doing the citations for this. Alongside my clotting problems I have just been provisionally diagnosed with POTS :-( but since tests have shown other autonomic dysfunction the initial "what @rseholes the 2 neurologists I intially saw are" is starting to wear off- quite worried. I have also ended up collating research on clotting disorders for the Nightingale Foundation. Ironically in other people's work my skill seems to be cross referencing citations and just generally finding relevant papers. for example 66% of clotting disorders have an undetermined hereditary cause- the NHS only tests for the remaining 34% if that. I also have a website: www.conversiondisorder.co.uk to work on. So I will really try and do the citations.

Best wishes- Simon

Simon 21:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)alpinist[reply]

Hello Paul. I wasn't sure how to contact you so I'm trying this and I apologize if I missed an easier way. The reason I'm writing you is that I have some questions concerning Parkinson's Disease that are not addressed in the wikipedia article. Currently (and for the last year), I spend 50+ hours a week providing home care to a gentleman who has early onset Parkinson's as well as a brain injury acquired at birth. At 31 he was diagnosed with Parkinson's and now he's 45 and the disease has progressed pretty much as expected, however I am having trouble understanding what symptoms that he presents stem from the Parkinson's or from his brain injury or from the medication he takes. I have numerous questions that probably wouldn't take up much of your time and I'd appreciate corresponding with you. If you have the time, please let me know at shane_gomez@hotmail.com P.S: what I am doing here is purely for my own interest and is without consent (or knowledge) of the family of the gentleman that I care for, as per the confidentiality interests of my client and company. In other words, I'm not coming to you to burden you with any questions about 'cures' or anything like that. I merely wish to share what I have observed about the disease and discuss a few of the unorthodox treatments that my client insists upon that I have questions and concerns about.

double dissociation

saw that you had a toe in the double dissociation pool. just tested the water myself, and added the classic broca wericke dd. thought i'd let you know. perhaps the article needs sub headings now? regards--Dylan2106 15:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archives
1