Jump to content

Contrail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Halibut Thyme (talk | contribs) at 23:57, 6 May 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Redirect5

The contrails of a four engined jet over London, England.
File:DSCN5474.JPG
A contrail seen from California, 2007.

Contrails or vapour trails are condensation trails and artificial cirrus clouds made by the exhaust of aircraft engines or wingtip vortices which precipitate a stream of tiny ice crystals in moist, frigid upper air. They are not air pollution, though they might be considered visual pollution.

Condensation from engine exhaust

The contrail of a twin engined jet over Edinburgh, Scotland.

Airplane trails

A vehicle engine's exhaust increases the amount of moisture in the air, which can push the water content of the air past saturation point. This causes condensation to occur, and the contrail to form. At high altitudes this water vapour emerges into a cold environment and the local increase in water vapour density condenses into tiny water droplets and/or desublimates into ice. The majority of the cloud content comes from water trapped in the surrounding air. At high altitudes, supercooled water vapour requires a trigger to encourage desublimation. The exhaust particles in the aircraft's exhaust act as this trigger, causing the trapped vapor to rapidly turn to ice crystals.

Condensation from wing-tip pressure

Wing-tip trail from a landing commercial airplane.

The wings of an airplane cause a drop in air pressure in the vicinity of the wing. This brings with it a drop in temperature, which can cause water to condense out of the air and form a contrail but only at higher altitudes. At lower altitudes, this phenomenon is also known as "ectoplasm." Ectoplasm is more commonly seen during high energy manouvers like those of a fighter jet, or on jet liners during takeoff and landing, at areas of very low pressure, including over the wings, and often around turbo-fan intakes on takeoff.

Contrails and climate

Contrails, by affecting cloud formation, can act as a radiative forcing. Studies have found that contrails trap outgoing longwave radiation emitted by the Earth and atmosphere (positive radiative forcing) at a greater rate than they reflect incoming solar radiation (negative radiative forcing). Therefore, the overall effect of contrails is a warming.[1] However, the effect varies daily and annually, and overall the size of the forcing is not well known: globally (for 1992 air traffic conditions), values range from 3.5 mW/m² to 17 mW/m². Other studies have determined that night flights are most responsible for the warming effect: while accounting for only 25% of daily air traffic, they contribute 60 to 80% of contrail radiative forcing. Similarly, winter flights account for only 22% of annual air traffic, but contribute half of the annual mean radiative forcing.[2]

September 11, 2001 climate impact study

It had been hypothesized that in regions such as the United States with heavy air traffic, contrails affected the weather, reducing solar heating during the day and radiation of heat during the night by increasing the albedo. The suspension of air travel for three days in the United States after September 11, 2001 provided an opportunity to test this hypothesis. Measurements did show that without contrails the local diurnal temperature range (difference of day and night temperatures) was about 1 degree Celsius higher than immediately before;[3] however, it has also been suggested that this was due to unusually clear weather during the period.[4]

See also


References

  1. ^ Ponater et al., GRL, 32 (10): L10706 2005
  2. ^ Stuber, Nicola (June 15, 2006). "The importance of the diurnal and annual cycle of air traffic for contrail radiative forcing". Nature. 441: 864–867. doi:10.1038/nature04877. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Travis et al., J. Climate, 17, 1123-1134, 2004
  4. ^ Kalkstein and Balling Jr., Climate Research, 26, 1-4, 2004