Talk:Tiamat (Dungeons & Dragons)

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result of the merge debate was do not merge. --Muchness 20:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Oppose -- articles are about two different things. User:Mrwuggs appears to be trying to get more exposure for Tiamat (planet) by eliminating acknowledgement of other Tiamat disambiguations. -- JHunterJ 18:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per JHunterJ. Leibniz 19:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Rather than those who oppose having to explain their reasons, shouldn't the person who proposed the merger list his/her reason(s)? Since no explanation for the proposed merger is given, could we simply remove the merge tag?--Robbstrd 20:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Beats me. After undoing some of Mrwuggs' work on Tiamat and Tiamat (disambiguation), I do at least appreciate the less intrusive method of a simple merge tag here, which should reach its (hopefully) obvious conclusion and that will be that. -- JHunterJ 20:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, as stated before, the articles are about different things. ddcc 16:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, it seems hard to find any common ground for the basis of a merge other than the name. 152.7.54.199 06:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC) User:Ikanreed[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.