eHarmony
eHarmony is a venture capital funded[1], marriage-oriented matchmaking website. The company does a great deal of advertising through television and the internet and requires users to complete a detailed compatibility questionnaire. eHarmony was co-founded by Dr. Neil Clark Warren and his son-in-law, former commercial real estate developer Greg Forgatch. Forgatch was eHarmony's founding CEO and President, while Warren is its Chairman of the Board. Dr. Warren's wife, Marylyn, handled eHarmony's PR for several years, but retired in 2005. Greg Waldorf[2] is the current CEO, while Greg Steiner is the current President and COO[3]. eHarmony's services are selective, that is, not all who apply for the service are accepted.
Founding and funding
eHarmony was founded in 2000 with $3 million of Series A funding from Fayez Sarofim & Co. and individual investors.[4] Dr. Warren, an evangelical Christian with strong ties to the conservative Christian community, attributes much of the initial success of eHarmony to its being promoted through James Dobson's Focus on the Family radio show.[5] In 2005 eHarmony sought to distance itself from Dobson and Focus on the Family, largely in an effort to broaden the market share of Warren's books and that of eHarmony according to Warren.[6] After Warren publicly distanced himself from Focus on the Family and purchased back the copyright from his earlier books from the organization, Dobson told his radio audience on May 26th, 2005, "I introduced Dr. Warren and his books — and eHarmony, more recently — to our listeners specifically because he was and it was decidedly Christian in nature," ... "Dr. Warren is anxious to change that direction. So ... we will go our separate ways ... with reluctance and regret."[7]
In 2004 eHarmony received the fourth largest venture capital investment of that year from two California-based companies, Sequoia Capital and Technology Crossover Ventures (Lee, 2004). The investment of $110 million is expected to fund eHarmony's branding process, which includes heavy advertising, and also to provide cash payments to the founders and 114 other individuals associated with the company (Rivlin, 2005). [8] [9]
eHarmony's "Singles Program"
Methodology
eHarmony's services are geared toward those looking for a long term relationship. Dr. Warren's goal is to reduce the divorce rate in America to less than 10% (it is estimated to be 40-50%). [10]
The company boasts to be the internet's number one paid matchmaking service based upon marriages per match. It has rather strict limitations, which Dr. Warren states are solely based on over 35 years of research into successful marriages. Factors "which may limit a user from experiencing eHarmony's matchmaking service to the fullest" include: still being married, 3 or more previous failed marriages resulting in divorce, severe depression and being under the age of 21. These users are immediately disqualified with extended support from the complete profile. eHarmony still extends their community forum, newsletters and customer care to these registrants.
Barring disqualification from the above mentioned criteria, a user who completes an initial personality analysis survey (essentially a personality test developed by Dr. Galen Buckwalter, Director of Research at eHarmony) may then specify a number of additional criteria, "self selects" by which to create a more accurate potential pool of recommended matches. Among the criteria available for the user's specificity are self selected age range, ethnicity, religious affiliation, geographical vicinity, and maternity/paternity status (children living with/children living away/no children). In conjunction with the 436 part profile, this is how all of the matches are delivered. One significant scoring factor is what may be called the honesty factor. This is a psychological profiling technique designed to score the relative honesty of the respondent. This factor is apparently considered by eHarmony as a significant factor in arriving at a good match. Contrary to many other matchmaking services, the user is not allowed to browse through profiles or choose potential matches themselves, and must rely completely on the eHarmony service itself to arrange potential matches. Some people consider this a positive, as it prevents people from 'making the same mistakes' they have made previously when selecting potential dates. [citation needed]
It should also be noted that the sheer number of questions may affect who uses eHarmony. It takes a significant amount of time to answer all the questions. Some believe that this discourages the less serious. Others believe that it discourages people with limited time, though it may be argued that someone who can't commit themselves to answering questions about themselves for 30 minutes may not be entirely able to dedicate the years of effort and commitment required of a lasting marriage. [citation needed]
It is also interesting to note that users are not permitted to choose matches based on marriage "experience" (i.e., divorced/widowed) as with other sites. While matches can be presumed to be currently unmarried (as eHarmony only offers matching services to legally single people) there is no option by which a "never-married" user could choose to only receive "never-married" matches, or a widower could request to be matched with a widow, etc.
eHarmony states that 20%, or 1 in 5 respondents are not able to predict with whom the user would best be matched.
Compatibility research
eHarmony's research methods and its models for compatibility matching have not been submitted to any peer-reviewed journals for evaluation and publication. However, eHarmony's research director, Dr. Steve Carter, Ph.D. did present a paper at the 2004, 16th annual American Psychological Society (APS) meeting. In the paper presented, Carter compared eHarmony couples married for more than 5 years with a control group, using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), a measure of couple satisfaction. The results showed that "Over 90% of eHarmony couples had marriage quality scores which were above average when compared to couples who had begun their relationships elsewhere. eHarmony couples were more than twice as likely to be in highly successful marriages than non-eHarmony couples... Not only are eHarmony couples 35% more likely than other married couples to report that they enjoy spending time together, but we found they are nearly twice as likely to report that their marriages are "extremely happy" or better versus other recently married couples." [11]
eHarmony's selection of a model for statistically choosing the factors to be included in their questionnaires was made using couples who scored in the top quartile of the DAS measure. The use of the DAS to measure outcomes may present a methodological flaw in establishing validity, because the DAS is not independent of eHarmony's models. Using an independent measure of satisfaction would be more convincing. However, eHarmony appears to be the only "matching" service online that has actually conducted either predictive or post hoc research using married couples to create or validate their methods. In fact, this use of empirical data from married couples to create a system for matching singles online is the core of eHarmony's patent (U.S. Patent No. 6,735,568).
Steve Carter also published a column in the APS Observer (the newsletter of the APS), about what it is like to work at eHarmony. This was criticized by some APS readers as an advertisement for the service, without any scientific merit. Other readers pointed out that eHarmony has never published data on how many of their matches do not result in satisfactory marriages, which makes it difficult to evaluate the service's relative value.
Membership demographics
According to press releases and news articles, the eHarmony population is represented by the following:
- more than 13 million users (as of Aug 22, 2005)
- more than 6,000 marriages between members (as of Aug 30, 2004)
- 88% are frustrated with the search for a mate and hope to find a husband or wife through eHarmony (as of Mar 8, 2004)
- 91% had received more than ten potential matches using eHarmony (as of Nov 20, 2003)
- 41% had tried other dating sites first (as of Nov 20, 2003)
Gender
- 42% are male
- 58% are female (Brand Channel, Feb 2005)
Race
- 83% are white (as of Mar 6, 2004)
- 6% are black (as of Mar 6, 2004)
- 4% are Hispanic or Latino (as of Mar 6, 2004)
Socioeconomic
- 46% of users have a bachelor's degree or higher (as of Mar 6, 2004)
- 64% report an income of more than $40,000 (as of Nov 20, 2003)
Religion
- 72% of members belong to a religious group (as of Mar 6, 2004)
- 21% of members identify themselves as "spiritual" (as of Mar 6, 2004)
- 7% say they are neither "religious nor spiritual" (as of Mar 6, 2004)
- Of those identified as religious, 91% say they are Christian; 3% identify themselves as Jewish; and 6% as "other" (as of Mar 6, 2004)
eHarmony's "Marriage Program"
In early 2006 eHarmony released a new Marriage Program designed to assist married couples to enrich their current relationship, or to try to help rescue marriages that may be in distress. In some ways this program is similar to eHarmony's Singles Program, involving questionnaires concerning communication, romance, sex and other topics. A computerized psychological profiling process is another already familiar aspect of the new Marriage Program. The program also offers a series of 12 online videos offering advice and guidance on various topics related to some of the most common types of marital concerns. The price for eHarmony's 'Marriage Program' ranges between $75 and $239, depending on how many program services may or may not be purchased. The first online video is free.[12] [13] [14]
Criticism
Consumer complaints
According to Online Dating Magazine, eHarmony's "most annoying feature" is that "once you have paid you can only communicate with other people who have paid." Other negative comments in various web forums include:
- Various problems relating to the matching mechanism used, such as:[15]
- Failure to match short men to tall women [16]
- After answering a 258 question profile, they are rejected because:[17]
- They are already married (30%);
- They are under the minimum age of 21 (27%);
- They provide inconsistent answers during the profile (9%)
- Dissatisfaction with standard email replies of the site's help desk.
- The procedure to unsubscribe as a paying member is complex and leads to errors or undesired credit card charges. Some complain the procedure is unfair or misleading.[18]
- Consumers have difficulty finding the company's phone number to speak to a live representative. The number for e-Harmony is 1-800-263-6133
- Some consider the service expensive ($60 for one month, $111 for three, etc.). The help line at 1-800-263-6133 will give introductory rates (e.g. $60 for three months).
Lack of Same-Sex Matching Options
The neutrality of this article is disputed. |
Critics note that eHarmony does not provide options for gay and lesbian people seeking a same-sex match. Dr. Warren claims that eHarmony lacks enough data to successfully match gay and lesbian couples. To date, eHarmony has failed to elaborate on the nature of these alleged psychological differences, or whether or not they are attempting to collect additional data on these differences.
Dr. Warren also states that because same-sex marriage is illegal in most states, eHarmony "doesn't really want to participate in something that's illegal." Critics counter by saying that the illegality of same-sex marriage is irrelevant, and that because same-sex dating and coupling is a legal activity that does not always lead to marriage, there is no sound reason for preventing gay and lesbian people from participating in any internet matching service. Additionally, same-sex marriage was legalized across Canada by the Civil Marriage Act enacted on July 20, 2005 and eHarmony Canada still does not match same-sex couples.
Dr. Warren further claims he hopes that homosexuals will find good matches, and claims to have assisted entrepreneurs looking to build a same-sex site similar to eHarmony; however, he declined to reveal the name of the site whose creators he claims to have advised.[19]
2007 lawsuit
As of May 31, 2007 eHarmony is being sued in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of Linda Carlson, who tried to use the site's services in February 2007. When Ms. Carlson was denied service because she is gay, she wrote to eHarmony asserting its policy was discriminatory under California law. According to one news source, "Carlson's lawyers expect a significant number of gays and lesbians to join the class action, which seeks to force eHarmony to end its policy and unspecified damages for those denied eHarmony services based on their sexual orientation."[20]
The company has issued the following statement in reference to the lawsuit, "It is false to state that eHarmony discriminates against gays or lesbians and making such allegations is reckless. The research that eHarmony has developed, through years of research, to match couples has been based on traits and personality patterns of successful heterosexual marriages. Nothing precludes eHarmony from providing same-sex matching in the future it's just not a service we offer now based upon the research we have conducted."
eHarmony Parody
The eHarmony commercial produced many parodies including the cox commercial for the DVR where "Entertainmentoligist" Dr. Franklin Sammuel Leonard explains the joys of the DVR along with various couples and the Saturday Night Live commercial skit of "MeHarmony" (and affiliates "HeHarmony" and "SheHarmony").
References and footnotes
- ^ NPR/ Fresh Air Interview by Terry Gross with Dr. Neil Warren taken on 09/17/05. Audio file. Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ Press release announcing Greg Waldorf as CEO of eHarmony Published 11/08/06.
- ^ Official eHarmony.com Management Team Bios
- ^ Dow Jones investor report, a summary of eHarmony's company history and economic growth. Published 12/22/04. Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ brandchannel.com profile of eHarmony's early history. Published 02/28/05. Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ USA Today article on new eHarmony strategy aimed at wider population sector. Published 05/18/06. Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ Salon.com in depth review of eHarmony. Published 06/10/05. Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ Lee, D. (2004). "Matchmaker site lands $110 million from San Jose, Calif.-area firms." Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. Dec 22, 2004.
- ^ Rivlin, G. (2005). "Venture capitalists pad founders' pockets." International Herald Tribune. August 5, 2005, p. 13.
- ^ eHarmony press release, an overview of company strategy. Published 05/06/05. Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ eHarmony press release on customer satisfaction study, Mar 15, 2004, results from an in-house clinical survey of former customers. Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ uSerplane.com, 02/07/06, eHarmony Releases Marital Assesment Program (finally!), downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ Wired.com, 05/05/06, Different Drums, But in EHarmony, downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ Online Dating Industry Journal (Find a full review of the "eHarmony Marriage" program approximately 1/2 way down.) Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ NPR/ Fresh Air Interview (ibid) Lists 8.3 million total applicants vs: over 1 million applicants being rejected.
- ^ [http://nossaonline.org/pressrelease.html National Organization Of Short Statured Adults, 04/02/2007 Press Release. Downloaded 04/09/2007.
- ^ They Met Online, but Definitely Didn't Click, By Paul Farhi, The Washington Post, Sunday, May 13, 2007; Page D01, downloaded 05/13/07.
- ^ Consumeraffairs.com eHarmony complaint log complaints lodged since 03/19/04. Downloaded on 06/05/06.
- ^ NPR/ Fresh Air Interview by Terry Gross with Dr. Neil Warren taken on 09/17/05. Audio file. Downloaded 06/05/06.
- ^ eHarmony sued in Calif. for excluding gays, Reuters, Published 5/31/07