Jump to content

Internal structure of Earth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ranierotazzi (talk | contribs) at 22:57, 23 June 2007 (added an internal link to "outer core"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Earth cutaway from core to exosphere. Not to scale.

The interior of the Earth, similar to the other terrestrial planets, is chemically divided into layers. The Earth has an outer silicate solid crust, a highly viscous mantle, a liquid outer core that is much less viscous than the mantle, and a solid inner core. Many of the rocks now making up the Earth's crust formed less than 100 million (1×108) years ago; however the oldest known mineral grains are 4.4 billion (4.4×109) years old, indicating that the Earth has had a solid crust for at least that long.[1]

Much of what is known about the interior of the Earth has been inferred. The force exerted by Earth's gravity is one measurement of its mass. After measuring the volume of the planet, its density can be calculated. Astronomers also have performed similar planetary measurements. Calculation of the mass and volume of the surface rocks and bodies of water allow estimation of the mass, volume and density of surface rocks. The mass which is not in the atmosphere, oceans, and surface rocks must be in deeper layers.

Structure

The structure of the Earth is separated into two categories: chemically differentiated layers and layers reflecting the strengths and density of the materials. Chemically, the Earth can be divided into the crust, mantle, outer core, and inner core. By material strength, the layering of the earth is categorized as lithosphere, asthenosphere, upper mantle, lower mantle, outer core, and the inner core. The geologic component layers of the Earth[2] are at the following depths below the surface:

Depth Layer
Kilometers Miles
0–60 0–37 Lithosphere (locally varies between 5 and 200 km)
0–35 0–22 ... Crust (locally varies between 5 and 70 km)
35–60 22–37 ... Uppermost part of mantle
35–2890 22–1790 Mantle
35–660 Upper Mantle
100–200 62–125 ... Asthenosphere
660–2890 –1790 Lower Mantle(Mesosphere)
2890–5150 1790–3160 Outer core
5150–6360 3160–3954 Inner core
Mapping the interior of the Earth with earthquake waves.

The layering of the Earth has been inferred indirectly using the time of travel of refracted and reflected seismic waves created by earthquakes. The core does not allow shear waves to pass through it, while the speed of travel (seismic velocity) is different in the other layers. The changes in the seismic velocity between the different layers causes refraction owing to Snell's law. Reflections are caused by a large increase in seismic velocity and are similar to light reflecting from a mirror.

Core

The average density of Earth is 5515 kg/m3, making it the densest planet in the Solar system. Since the average density of surface material is only around 3000 kg/m3, we must conclude that denser materials exist within Earth's core. Further evidence for the high density core comes from the study of seismology. In its earliest stages, about 4.5 billion (4.5×109) years ago, melting would have caused denser substances to sink toward the center in a process called planetary differentiation (see also the iron catastrophe), while less-dense materials would have migrated to the crust. As a result, the core is largely composed of iron (80%), along with nickel and one or more light elements, whereas other dense elements, such as lead and uranium, either are too rare to be significant or tend to bind to lighter elements and thus remain in the crust (see felsic materials).

Seismic measurements show that the core is divided into two parts, a solid inner core with a radius of ~1220 km and a liquid outer core extending beyond it to a radius of ~3400 km. The solid inner core was discovered in 1936 by Inge Lehmann and is generally believed to be composed primarily of iron and some nickel. Some have argued that the inner core may be in the form of a single iron crystal.[3][4] The liquid outer core surrounds the inner core and is believed to be composed of iron mixed with nickel and trace amounts of lighter elements. Recent speculation suggests that the innermost part of the core is enriched in very heavy elements, trans-cesium elements (above atomic number 55), this would include gold, mercury and uranium.[5]

It is generally believed that convection in the outer core, combined with stirring caused by the Earth's rotation (see: Coriolis effect), gives rise to the Earth's magnetic field through a process described by the dynamo theory. The solid inner core is too hot to hold a permanent magnetic field (see Curie temperature) but probably acts to stabilise the magnetic field generated by the liquid outer core.

Recent evidence has suggested that the inner core of Earth may rotate slightly faster than the rest of the planet.[6] In August 2005 a team of geophysicists announced in the journal Science that, according to their estimates, Earth's inner core rotates approximately 0.3 to 0.5 degrees per year relative to the rotation of the surface.[7][8]

The current scientific explanation for the Earth's temperature gradient is a combination of the heat left over from the planet's initial formation, the decay of radioactive elements, and the freezing of the inner core. Other theories include the georeactor theory.

Mantle

Schematic view of the interior of Earth. 1. continental crust - 2. oceanic crust - 3. upper mantle - 4. lower mantle - 5. outer core - 6. inner core - A: Mohorovičić discontinuity - B: Gutenberg Discontinuity - C: Lehmann discontinuity

Earth's mantle extends to a depth of 2890 km, making it the largest layer of the Earth. The pressure, at the bottom of the mantle, is ~140 GPa (1.4 Matm). The mantle is composed of silicate rocks that are rich in iron and magnesium relative to the overlying crust. Although solid, the high temperatures within the mantle cause the silicate material to be sufficiently ductile that it can flow on very long timescales. Convection of the mantle is expressed at the surface through the motions of tectonic plates. The melting point and viscosity of a substance depends on the pressure it is under. As there is intense and increasing pressure as one travels deeper into the mantle, the lower part of the mantle flows less easily than does the upper mantle (chemical changes within the mantle may also be important). The viscosity of the mantle ranges between 1021 and 1024 Pa·s, depending on depth.[9] In comparison, the viscosity of water is approximately 10-3 Pa·s and that of pitch 107 Pa·s. Thus, the mantle flows very slowly.

Why is the inner core solid, the outer core liquid, and the mantle solid/plastic? The answer depends both on the relative melting points of the different layers (nickel-iron core, silicate crust and mantle) and on the increase in temperature and pressure as one moves deeper into the Earth. At the surface both nickel-iron alloys and silicates are sufficiently cool to be solid. In the upper mantle, the silicates are generally solid (localised regions with small amounts of melt exist); however, as the upper mantle is both hot and under relatively little pressure, the rock in the upper mantle has a relatively low viscosity. In contrast, the lower mantle is under tremendous pressure and therefore has a higher viscosity than the upper mantle. The metallic nickel-iron outer core is liquid despite the enormous pressure as it has a melting point that is lower than the mantle silicates. The inner core is solid due to the overwhelming pressure found at the center of the planet.

Crust

The crust ranges from 5 to 70 km in depth. The thin parts are oceanic crust composed of dense (mafic) iron magnesium silicate rocks and underlie the ocean basins. The thicker crust is continental crust, which is less dense and composed of (felsic) sodium potassium aluminium silicate rocks. The crust-mantle boundary occurs as two physically different events. First, there is a discontinuity in the seismic velocity, which is known as the Mohorovičić discontinuity or Moho. The cause of the Moho is thought to be a change in rock composition from rocks containing plagioclase feldspar (above) to rocks that contain no feldspars (below). Second, there is a chemical discontinuity between ultramafic cumulates and tectonized harzburgites, which has been observed from deep parts of the oceanic crust that have been obducted into the continental crust and preserved as ophiolite sequences.

Historical development and alternative conceptions

In 1692 Edmund Halley (in a paper printed in Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London) put forth the idea of Earth consisting of a hollow shell about 500 miles thick, with two inner concentric shells around an innermost core, corresponding to the diameters of the planets Venus, Mars, and Mercury respectively.[10] Halley's construct was a method of accounting for the (flawed) values of the relative density of the Earth and the Moon that had been given by Sir Isaac Newton, in Principia (1687).“Sir Isaac Newton has demonstrated the Moon to be more solid than our Earth, as 9 to 5" Halley remarked; "why may we not then suppose four ninths of our globe to be cavity?”[10]

In 1818, John Cleves Symmes, Jr. suggested that the Earth consisted of a hollow shell about 800 miles (1,300 km) thick, with openings about 1400 miles (2,300 km) across at both poles with 4 inner shells each open at the poles. Jules Verne, in Journey to the Center of the Earth imagined vast interior caverns, and William Reed, in Phantom of the Poles (1906) imagined a hollow earth.

Some Christian writers resisted the idea of a spherical Earth on theological grounds, without gaining widespread acceptance. The Flat Earth Society, previously presided by Charles K. Johnson, in the USA work hard to keep the concept alive, and have claimed a few thousand followers.[11] Some Christians in England and the United States tried to revive flat Earth thinking in the 19th century.

The drilling of the Kola Superdeep Borehole was the inspiration for an urban legend, the "well to hell hoax".

See also

Notes

  1. ^ http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0101/14earthwater/
  2. ^ T. H. Jordan, "Structural Geology of the Earth's Interior", Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1979, Sept., 76(9): 4192–4200.
  3. ^ Cohen, Ronald. "Crystal at the Center of the Earth". Retrieved 2007-02-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Lars Stixrude and R. E. Cohen, "High-Pressure Elasticity of Iron and Anisotropy of Earth's Inner Core", Science 31 March 1995: Vol. 267. no. 5206, pp. 1972 - 1975 DOI: 10.1126/science.267.5206.1972
  5. ^ Wootton, Anne (September 2006) "Earth's Inner Fort Knox" Discover 27(9): p.18;
  6. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/25/science/25cnd-core.html
  7. ^ Kerr, Richard A. (26 August 2005) "Earth's Inner Core Is Running a Tad Faster Than the Rest of the Planet" Science 309(5739): p.1313;
  8. ^ Chang, Kenneth (26 August 2005) "Scientists Say Earth's Center Rotates Faster Than Surface" The New York Times Sec. A, Col. 1, p.13;
  9. ^ http://www2.uni-jena.de/chemie/geowiss/geodyn/poster2.html
  10. ^ a b N. Kollerstrom, 1992. "The hollow world of Edmond Halley" from Journal for History of Astronomy 23, 185-192
  11. ^ http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/flatearth.html

References

  • Herndon, J. Marvin (1994) Planetary and Protostellar Nuclear Fission: Implications for Planetary Change, Stellar Ignition and Dark Matter Proceedings: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 445, No. 1924 (May 9, 1994) , pp. 453-461
  • Herndon, J. Marvin (1996) Substructure of the inner core of the Earth Vol. 93, Issue 2, 646-648, January 23, 1996, PNAS
  • Hollenbach, D. F. ,dagger and J. M. HerndonDagger (2001) Deep-Earth reactor: Nuclear fission, helium, and the geomagnetic field Published online before print September 18, 2001, 10.1073/pnas.201393998, September 25, 2001, vol. 98, no. 20, PNAS
  • Lehmann, I. (1936) Inner Earth, Bur. Cent. Seismol. Int. 14, 3-31
  • Schneider, David (Oct 1996) A Spinning Crystal Ball, Scientific American