Jump to content

User talk:Staecker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vanished user 3208088 (talk | contribs) at 02:58, 24 August 2007 (Regarding Image:BigPondWebPortal-Jul07.jpg & Image:BigPondWebPortal.jpg). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives
Please add new comments at the bottom using the "+" button next to the "edit this page" tab

Sorry my mistake

Chris, your bot has tagged some images which were not duplicates which I tried to take off at the list page. But both times while I tried to edit the individual entries it seems to have blanked the page. Sorry. --Kevin Murray 04:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Delete

Image:CR41WesternBegin.jpg & Image:CR41EasternTerminus.jpg ;I couldn't figure out how to rename the files into north and south, so I created new ones. But you can delete those two because they are duplicates. Sorry for the confusion. Airtuna08 00:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Please delete the image ACv6logo2.jpg you recently tagged. For some reason, the first time I uploaded the original image file it returned a red x box instead of the logo itself, but all seems to be showing now properly.

Info copying

Your bot copied the file info from a deleted duplicate to the original image. Trouble is that it overwrote the copyright info, which clearly stated it was an image under free licence from the uploader. That caused a near heart attack amongst the Harry Potter editors as this was the first free image of J.K. Rowling to be found in nearly 9 months of looking! The image is Image:Jk-rowling-crop.JPG and the deleted duplicate was Image:Jk-crop.JPG. Perhaps you can modify your bot so that, when copying file info for files under different licences, it appended data instead of overwriting the licence? Thanks. AulaTPN 17:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of a bug like that before, but there's a first time for everything... This diff my bot's edit, but it seems to me that the mixup was on the next edit by User:Gavin Scott. Let me know if I'm wrong about that- I'd like to fix the bug if there really is one. Staecker 19:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
<embarrassed>Gosh, you're absolutely right - I completely missed the fact that the multilicence template was still there after your bot's edit. Please accept my apologies - tonight is my night for screwing up it seems.</embarrassed> AulaTPN 23:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Staecker 01:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Broxburn, West Lothian

I received an automated message that a pic I placed on the above page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Greendykes_Road%2C_Broxburn.jpg) is to be deleted. Could I please keep this file as I messed up uploading the image the first time. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Tissues 09:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greedo_shoots_first.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Greedo_shoots_first.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 23:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Non-free use disputed for Image:Greedo_shoots_first.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Greedo_shoots_first.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea about that

Hey i was looking for some1 to delete those for me..=]..can u do it?..but only Image:Your hody!.jpg and Image:Your Body!.jpg not the new 1 i uploaded..=] u cant stop me + ma sis we genius!(wat waz dat?) 19:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

u taking pretty long lol..=] u cant stop me + ma sis we genius!(wat waz dat?) 19:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok i dont think u understood i am completely ok with u deleting the pictures as long as u dont delete..the new one is Image:Your_body!.jpg=] u cant stop me + ma sis we genius!(wat waz dat?) 19:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understood just fine, but wasn't at my computer. Are you in a hurry? Staecker 20:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oh ma bad dude yea i waz in a hurry..ma bad..oh and the pic isnt copyrighted Pretty Ricky has it on their myspace and they allow us to use thier pics for evertyhing else..=] u cant stop me + ma sis we genius!(wat waz dat?) 01:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bleach soundtrack cover

Hi, your bot is really interesting. However, I recently uploaded a image of an anime soundtrack and it said it is suspected to be a duplicate of a desperate housewife character. Should I ignore it or get an admin to help? Any help would be appreciated. -ScotchMB 23:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can ignore it. The suspicious images are always checked by hand, and in this case nobody would mistakenly delete it. You can actually de-list it yourself by removing the appropriate line from the suspicious images page. Staecker 02:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image:BigPondWebPortal-Jul07.jpg & Image:BigPondWebPortal.jpg

I was in the process of renaming Image:BigPondWebPortal-Jul07.jpg to Image:BigPondWebPortal.jpg (Because the image title is inaccurate) but before I could delete the original image (Image:BigPondWebPortal-Jul07.jpg) you went ahead and deleted the new one I had created (Image:BigPondWebPortal.jpg). I wasn't able to quickly delete the original image because I had forgotten the image deletion procedure and was trying to look it up. Anyway can you please restore Image:BigPondWebPortal.jpg and then delete Image:BigPondWebPortal-Jul07.jpg? --cheese-cube 02:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Staecker&oldid=153279320"