User talk:Khampalak

<personal attack by Khampalak removed>

Khampalak, I have warned you repeatedly about the severity of your personal attacks. You disregarded my many warnings with this edit: 1. All you had to do was simply revert the unblanking. If Anoshirawan continued you could have reported him for trolling your talk page. For not taking any of the warnings I gave you seriously, your account has been blocked for 48 hours. If you feel this block is unjustified you may request an unblock with the following template: {{unblock|your reason}}. Please take this following time to remember that Wikipedia is not a battle ground and there is no need to handle your disputes in this manner.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 04:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've given up on resolving disputes with those people. Frankly, resolution is not possible. All you have to do is look into his contributions to see an obvious pattern of vandalism. It does not take an expert on the subject to figure out what's going on there. What you seem unable or unwilling to understand is why those users are editing articles on Wikipedia in the first place. There are two possibilities...

i) You don't have a history with these guys.

or

ii) You are involved in the same activities.

You have made it quite clear where you stand though. You are as guilty as they are of corrupting the integrity of those articles, whether it is intentional or not. Have a good day. --Khampalak 16:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you seem unwilling or unable to understand is Wikipedia does not tolerate personal attacks on anyone. You choose not to follow that policy.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also choose to reject blatant vandalism and propaganda on what is supposed to be a reliable source of information. Don't you think that is something you should be doing? --Khampalak 17:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

ugen64 05:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khampalak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An indefinite block seems excessive. I've seen others go unpunished for more severe offenses. How about some even-handed enforcement of your policies, hmm?

Decline reason:

This provides absolutely no reason to believe that you will refrain from personal attacks in the future. As such, it would be inappropriate to unblock you at this time. — Yamla 17:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fine whatever. I'm finished with this shit. Vandals and racists should feel perfectly at home here. That's who is being protected after all. It's all a simple matter of looking at each user's contributions and the various related discussions. More than a few editors have tried dealing with users Beh-nam and Anoshirawan. There have been personal attacks against me and my ethnicity, yet nothing has ever been done to those users (Beh-nam and Anoshirawan). They have vandalized article after article for years, ignoring all attempts at resolving differences. None of the admins do anything about it. You don't enforce the revert/npov/etc policies... yet you block me for stating the obvious. You all deserve one another. Have a nice life.