User talk:ExtraDry

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This block will give you a chance to cool down, to maintain civility, and not continue your personal attacks. Carlossuarez46 21:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExtraDry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Abuse of Admin powers, User does not want me to improve article that He AFD ExtraDry 21:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Inadequate reason for unblock. — Sandstein 22:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, "It;s [sic] in progress dichead[sic]" is inappropriate and tends to indicate that no admin abuse is happening here. --Yamla 22:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExtraDry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

31 Hours is overkill, AGF is very hard to do when the article is AFD not even 24 hours after it is created. No personal attacks were made on talkpages.

Decline reason:

No personal attacks were made? What was that, then? MaxSem 07:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't remove previous declined unblock requests, it makes it more difficult to review your block. S_QL^{Query me!} 07:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExtraDry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You did not read what got written. I said and I quote No personal attacks were made on talkpages Which what is what got said in the block log which is incorrect.

Decline reason:

Quit arguing semantics. The block was entirely appropriate, please sit out its duration. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExtraDry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

semantics is the reason for this incorrect block, One edit summary does not need 31 hours. Provide a diff where personal attacks were made on talkpages as the blocking admin said otherwise the block is incorrect

Decline reason:

appropriate block, as explained

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just a comment... the blocking admin, in the block log, says, and I quote "Attempting to harass other users: personal attacks on pages & edit summary". Notice the words "edit summary" in the block log. --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 08:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice the words on pages There was none done on any pages. Once this whole saga is over i will make a new username as Orderinchaos has incorrectly added another users blocklog to mine. ExtraDry 08:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]