Jump to content

User talk:Jeff Schweitzer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jeff Schweitzer (talk | contribs) at 14:04, 15 November 2007 (sorry, forgot to sign). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Jeff Schweitzer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! AecisBrievenbus 23:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jeff Schweitzer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jeff Schweitzer, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Schweitzer. Thank you. AecisBrievenbus 00:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jeff Schweitzer for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 01:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jeff Schweitzer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jeff Schweitzer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message; oops, forgot to sign, my apologies Jeff Schweitzer 14:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message; oops, forgot to sign, my apologies [[User:Jeff Schweitzer|Jeff Schweitzer]] 14:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message; oops, forgot to sign, my apologies [[User:Jeff Schweitzer|Jeff Schweitzer]] 14:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message; oops, forgot to sign, my apologies [[User:Jeff Schweitzer|Jeff Schweitzer]] 14:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}